Hi Ben,
trying to run Periscope on the latest Pharo image, I see that
everything is broken again. Please, start to write some documentation
about Spec development, what have you changed, what do you plan to
change, what are the new prefered ways to write UI specification and
how to migrate old
if your item is already a collection, and you want a column per item, just
return it
wrap: item index: idx
^ item
Ben
On Jan 8, 2013, at 3:37 AM, J. P. L. Martín wrote:
Ok, extent worked for size, so the wrap question remains active :P
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:35 PM, J. P.
I didn't change anything :(
I know that Stef made some major refactor, but I can't tell more
I have my final exams this week so I can't have a look, but I will the next week
Ben
On Jan 8, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
Hi Ben,
trying to run Periscope on the latest Pharo image, I
I get an error when doing so:
MessageNotUnderstood: Prestamocollect:
doesNotUnderstand: #collect:
MulticolumnLazyListMorph widthToDisplayItem:
Leo
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Benjamin
benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com wrote:
if your item is already a collection, and you want a column
is your item a collection ??
Because it seems that the item you return is a Prestamo and that this
Prestamo doesn't understand the Collection methods
Ben
On Jan 8, 2013, at 1:26 PM, J. P. L. Martín wrote:
I get an error when doing so:
MessageNotUnderstood: Prestamocollect:
I point the list to an class instance database wich is
anOrderedCollection of Prestamo, you can see the code here:
https://github.com/arguser/Paradigmas-Final/blob/master/Paradigmas-Final.st
If I leave wrap: item like this: ^ item asOrderedCollection collect [:e | e
asString
On Tue, Jan 8,
Sorry, magical hotkey pressed by mistake.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:47 AM, J. P. L. Martín argu...@gmail.com wrote:
I point the list to an class instance database wich is
anOrderedCollection of Prestamo, you can see the code here:
Just curious...
Is it possible to open a second native window in addition to the
standard one when the image starts? Then the Small Morphic could be
tested with that second window while the programming is safely done in
the first.
In addition, this feature could be useful for dual monitors.
Hi Ben,
trying to run Periscope on the latest Pharo image, I see that
everything is broken again. Please, start to write some documentation
about Spec development, what have you changed, what do you plan to
change, what are the new prefered ways to write UI specification and
how to
On Jan 8, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi Ben,
trying to run Periscope on the latest Pharo image, I see that
everything is broken again. Please, start to write some documentation
about Spec development, what have you changed, what do you plan to
change, what are the new
On 8 January 2013 14:04, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
Just curious...
Is it possible to open a second native window in addition to the standard
one when the image starts? Then the Small Morphic could be tested with that
second window while the programming is safely done in the first.
Hi Stef,
get it here:
Gofer new
smalltalkhubUser: 'PavelKrivanek' project: 'Periscope';
package: 'Periscope';
load.
activate with:
Nautilus pluginClasses add: {(Smalltalk at: #NautilusPeriscopePlugin). #none} .
I tried to change it to the array form but it doesn't help. This is
Can you show me your SpecLayout please ?
Ben
On Jan 8, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
Hi Stef,
get it here:
Gofer new
smalltalkhubUser: 'PavelKrivanek' project: 'Periscope';
package: 'Periscope';
load.
activate with:
Nautilus pluginClasses add: {(Smalltalk at:
It does in plugin specs, for example
defaultSpec
^{ #ComposableSpec.
#vResizing:.#shrinkWrap.
#add:. {{self. #textModel}.
#layout:. #(0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0)}.
}
-- Pavel
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Benjamin
it seems that #layout is expecting a LayoutFrame as argument.
But since I do not know what Stef and Igor changed (and what they didn't fix
^^) I can't tell more than that :s
And I do not have too much time right now, sorry
Ben
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
It does in
Hello,
I was writing a small utility using FileSystem. I had never used
FileSystem before. So I am browsing the code trying to learn where to
start and how to use it.
It took me a little while to learn to do something like:
fs := FileSystem store: (DiskStore activeClass createDefault).
It
Hi pavel
where is your code?
Because we did a massive refactoring with igor to free layoutFrame users
from the tyranny of fractions:offset:
so you can have a look at some spec in the latest 20 and you will see that
now
we use
#layout: . #(0 0 1 1 0 22 0 0)
why ??
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
Hello,
I was writing a small utility using FileSystem. I had never used
FileSystem before. So I am browsing the code trying to learn where to
start and how to use it.
It took me a little while to learn to do something like:
fs := FileSystem store: (DiskStore
I will check.
May be this evening.
We transformed systematically
defaultSpec
^ { #ComposableSpec.
#add:. { self topSpec.
#layout:.
{#LayoutFrame.
We wrote a chapter on FileSystem.
Did you miss it?
http://rmod.lille.inria.fr/pbe2/
Stef
On Jan 8, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
Hello,
I was writing a small utility using FileSystem. I had never used FileSystem
before. So I am browsing the code trying to learn where to
On 01/06/2013 05:22 PM, Ciprian Teodorov wrote:
Happy new year everybody!
I am pleased to announce today the initial release of TalkFFI.
Wow! I have been waiting for something SWIG like for Squeak/Pharo since...
hell, I dunno, since like ever. ;)
This kind of stuff might very well be
On 1/8/2013 10:33 AM, Ben Coman wrote:
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
Hello,
I was writing a small utility using FileSystem. I had never used
FileSystem before. So I am browsing the code trying to learn where to
start and how to use it.
It took me a little while to learn to do something like:
fs :=
On 1/8/2013 10:35 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
We wrote a chapter on FileSystem.
Did you miss it?
http://rmod.lille.inria.fr/pbe2/
Stef
Thanks Stef.
I had not seen that.
Jimmie
On 08.01.2013, at 17:07, Jimmie Houchin jlhouc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was writing a small utility using FileSystem. I had never used FileSystem
before. So I am browsing the code trying to learn where to start and how to
use it.
It took me a little while to learn to do something
On 2013-01-08, at 17:55, Max Leske maxle...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08.01.2013, at 17:07, Jimmie Houchin jlhouc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was writing a small utility using FileSystem. I had never used FileSystem
before. So I am browsing the code trying to learn where to start and how
anyway, even if there are easier ways to create references, I think Jimmie is
right, there are inconsistencies in the protocol.
maybe for 3.0?
On Jan 8, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Camillo Bruni camillobr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-01-08, at 17:55, Max Leske maxle...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Repository refuses connection.
On 06-01-2013 14:22, Ciprian Teodorov wrote:
Happy new year everybody!
I am pleased to announce today the initial release of TalkFFI.
TalkFFI enables /automatic/ FFI generation for Smalltalk.
It uses libclang http://clang.llvm.org to parse *unmodified* C
On 01/08/2013 06:26 PM, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
Repository refuses connection.
Works for me. Both anon or with my SH credentials.
regards, Göran
Benjamin Van Ryseghem-2 wrote
Why using a meaningless array when we could use object ?
+1. This seems hard to use/understand. If we don't want to depend on
Morphic, let Spec define its own intention revealing messages.
--
View this message in context:
On 2013-01-08, at 18:01, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:
anyway, even if there are easier ways to create references, I think Jimmie is
right, there are inconsistencies in the protocol.
maybe for 3.0?
yes definitely :).
Jimmie, maybe you can open an issue on
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 January 2013 08:54, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote:
When one deploys an image one usually requires ONLY
the image - not the source or changes file. An image locker
code would look like this:
On 8 January 2013 18:12, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:
Benjamin Van Ryseghem-2 wrote
Why using a meaningless array when we could use object ?
+1. This seems hard to use/understand. If we don't want to depend on
Morphic, let Spec define its own intention revealing messages.
Or
+1
anyway, even if there are easier ways to create references, I think Jimmie
is right, there are inconsistencies in the protocol.
maybe for 3.0?
yes definitely :).
Jimmie, maybe you can open an issue on code.google.com/p/pharo/?
with a complete list of the methods you find
Ok so to clarify what I want with Spec:
- move LayoutFrame outside of Morphic. Now I'm not sure that spec
should depend on it, may be.
- LayoutFrame is a bad name for a transformation specification.
- I do not think that an Array is good but I do not think that
On 25 December 2012 14:48, Fernando Olivero fernando.oliv...@usi.ch wrote:
Hi, two good sources of information on GUI building are
http://www.pharocasts.com/2011/02/pharo-gui-with-polymorph.html?utm_source=BP_recent
Nevin Pratt wrote
For what it's worth, the UI blocking also happens occasionally (not very
often,
but occasionally) with Squeak 3.8/Seaside 2.8. But it's easy to unblock.
Just
run the screenshot app (within Seaside), then at the top there is a
Suspend
UI Process link. Click it to
...at http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2662/.
CogVM binaries as per VMMaker.oscog-eem.251/r2662
Give primitiveRemLargeIntegers primitive # 20.
Add yet another libc line to the linux launch script(s), and try and make
the
script suggest users extend it themselves. you can lead a
Hi all, as part of a thesis I have been working on, I extended Smalllint to
let it check Traits and Traits specific errors.
The enviroment objects and the refactoring scope browsers now handles and
list classes and traits (before they just handled classes). The new
refactoring scope selection is
...and at http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2664.
CogVM binaries as per VMMaker.oscog-eem.252/r2664.
Issue 117. Fix primitiveRemLargeIntegers.
The result should be negated iff receiver negative.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.comwrote:
...at
Thanks for all the suggestions for easier way to create references.
Part of the problem is that I did not sufficiently read the
documentation in the class comment. I also did not know of the PBE2
chapter referenced by Stef.
Part of the problem is also that the browser in 2.0 is presenting
On 09/01/13 12:05 AM, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
Part of the problem is that I did not sufficiently read the
documentation in the class comment. I also did not know of the PBE2
chapter referenced by Stef.
I used to assume that class comments were empty. Nowadays, there is
often useful information
On 1/8/2013 11:18 PM, Yanni Chiu wrote:
On 09/01/13 12:05 AM, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
Part of the problem is that I did not sufficiently read the
documentation in the class comment. I also did not know of the PBE2
chapter referenced by Stef.
I used to assume that class comments were empty.
42 matches
Mail list logo
