Re: [Pharo-project] {Spam?} Names for the pharo scripting syntax

2009-01-20 Thread Michael Roberts
+1 I would pick something that meant free (liberated) or light weight. I can't think of many at the moment but how about wisp or crest (of a wave) Mike On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote: We want a real scripting syntax not with !! I will not

Re: [Pharo-project] {Spam?} Names for the pharo scripting syntax

2009-01-20 Thread Alexandre Bergel
I would pick something that meant free (liberated) or light weight. I can't think of many at the moment but how about wisp or crest (of a wave) crest is nice :) Central Resistant Emancipating Smalltalk French: écume I like crest and écume Alexandre

Re: [Pharo-project] {Spam?} Names for the pharo scripting syntax

2009-01-19 Thread Bill Schwab
Stef, My first reaction is why is it not Smalltalk? Not the name, but the language itself. Is there something I missed/should read to understand it? Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email:

Re: [Pharo-project] {Spam?} Names for the pharo scripting syntax

2009-01-19 Thread Damien Pollet
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 00:47, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote: My first reaction is why is it not Smalltalk? Not the name, but the language itself. Is there something I missed/should read to understand it? +1 , i don't understand too, what makes 'scripting' in smalltalk too

Re: [Pharo-project] {Spam?} Names for the pharo scripting syntax

2009-01-19 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
We want a real scripting syntax not with !! I will not reopen the story: wait and see. This is since two years that we have that nearly ready but never suceeded to release it. On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:23 PM, Bill Schwab wrote: Stef, My first reaction is why is it not Smalltalk? Not the