Re: [Pharo-project] A centralized repository (Going a step forward Gofer and Metacello)

2009-12-07 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
Ok, that is all the blessing needed :) I will start work on a first version of tools needed (there are not mutch at all) and I will upload a meta-package as soon as I have it working, to test it. On first stage, we will use a centralized repository on SqueakSource, and on second stage we can

Re: [Pharo-project] A centralized repository (Going a step forward Gofer and Metacello)

2009-12-07 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Dec 7, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: Ok, that is all the blessing needed :) I will start work on a first version of tools needed (there are not mutch at all) and I will upload a meta-package as soon as I have it working, to test it. On first stage, we will use a

Re: [Pharo-project] A centralized repository (Going a step forward Gofer and Metacello)

2009-12-07 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.comwrote: Ok, that is all the blessing needed :) I will start work on a first version of tools needed (there are not mutch at all) and I will upload a meta-package as soon as I have it working, to test it. On first stage, we

Re: [Pharo-project] A centralized repository (Going a step forward Gofer and Metacello)

2009-12-07 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
Done. It is named MetacelloRepository :) On 2009-12-07 10:28:05 -0300, Mariano Martinez Peck marianop...@gmail.com said: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.comwrot= e: Ok, that is all the blessing needed :) I will start work on a first version of

Re: [Pharo-project] A centralized repository (Going a step forward Gofer and Metacello)

2009-12-07 Thread Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez
El lun, 07-12-2009 a las 09:57 -0300, Esteban Lorenzano escribió: Ok, that is all the blessing needed :) I will start work on a first version of tools needed (there are not mutch at all) and I will upload a meta-package as soon as I have it working, to test it. On first stage, we will use

Re: [Pharo-project] A centralized repository (Going a step forward Gofer and Metacello)

2009-12-07 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
I want a catalog for Pharo because I want to know what I can load in Pharo. Especially because I will be a time where we will have too many differences with squeak. Stef On Dec 7, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Esteban Lorenzano

Re: [Pharo-project] A centralized repository (Going a step forward Gofer and Metacello)

2009-12-05 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Hi lorenzo YES! we need a catalog in place of Universe package. I think that using monticello as a way to store metacello config is the way to go. We do not need to integrate metacello for now (even if the goal is to succeed to manage Pharo with metacello). We could do Gofer

[Pharo-project] A centralized repository (Going a step forward Gofer and Metacello)

2009-12-04 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
Hi all, I’m begining to transfer all my projects to metacello (I think this is the best package manager present today for pharo), and I have an idea I want to share and discuss: I think we need a metacello based centered repository. The universe doesn’t fit with metacello and squeakmap even

Re: [Pharo-project] A centralized repository (Going a step forward Gofer and Metacello)

2009-12-04 Thread Dale Henrichs
Esteban, I think that what you are proposing makes a lot of sense, although I am a bit biased ... a central repository would definitely make it very simple to find projects that are managed... It seems that in addition to to the Monticello repository of configurations, a catalog website that