On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Dan Corneanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I missing something?
Is there an extra step I should perform before being able to use the
image for development?
In the meantime, I'll continue using the dev image.
The pharo-dev that you can find at
2008/10/12 Damien Cassou [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Alexandre Bergel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this tool deserve to have an entry in ScriptLoader
Generating dev images takes me a lot of time. It seems pharo
developers are not interested in pharo-dev images
I am also interested in that for Moose.
Cheers,
Doru
On Oct 12, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
2008/10/12 Damien Cassou [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Alexandre Bergel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this tool deserve to have an entry in ScriptLoader
Just a point of explanation.
For pharo we want to have one image (one click) with all the dev tools
listed on the web-page of damien.
Then this image will be based on a core image and with tools
integrated (minimal number of class
extensions).
One of the reasons we asked damien not to do a
Alexandre Bergel writes:
You should continue to produce your dev image.
I have seen a lot of people using it. Really.
I'm using the dev image. Both for pharo and Squeak 3.10.
Bryce
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
