Btw, if you want to optimize for shorter-encodings, couldn't you do
asm
cmp: asm EAX with: 16r80;
jl: oneByte;
cmp: asm EAX with: 16r800;
jl: twoBytes;
cmp: asm EAX with:16r1000;
jl: threeBytes;
label: fourBytes;
...
jmp end;
label: threeBytes;
...
On 21 June 2012 16:59, Henrik Sperre Johansen
henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no wrote:
Btw, if you want to optimize for shorter-encodings, couldn't you do
asm
cmp: asm EAX with: 16r80;
jl: oneByte;
cmp: asm EAX with: 16r800;
jl: twoBytes;
cmp: asm EAX with:16r1000;
jl:
On 13.06.2012 14:59, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 13 June 2012 10:31, Philippe Marschall
philippe.marsch...@netcetera.ch wrote:
On 06/13/2012 04:44 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hi, hardcore hackers.
please take a look at the code and tell if it can be improved.
The AsmJit snippet below transforms an
On 14 June 2012 14:05, Henrik Sperre Johansen
henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no wrote:
On 13.06.2012 14:59, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 13 June 2012 10:31, Philippe Marschall
philippe.marsch...@netcetera.ch wrote:
On 06/13/2012 04:44 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hi, hardcore hackers.
please take a
Hi Igor,
It is very good that someone tries to optimize this, it is a weak point
currently, performance wise.
I am not a low-level guy, so I can't really help with the assembler code. But
utf-8 encoding/decoding is an area that interests me.
I can point to the 2 currently available utf-8
On Jun 13, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Hi Igor,
It is very good that someone tries to optimize this, it is a weak point
currently, performance wise.
I am not a low-level guy, so I can't really help with the assembler code. But
utf-8 encoding/decoding is an area
On 06/13/2012 04:44 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hi, hardcore hackers.
please take a look at the code and tell if it can be improved.
The AsmJit snippet below transforms an unicode integer value
to 1..4-byte sequence of utf-8
then the outer piece of code (which is not yet written) will
On 13 Jun 2012, at 10:29, Marcus Denker wrote:
We shoud standardize on *one* converter... what is the use of everyone doing
it again?
Ultimately, yes, there should be one.
However, it does not hurt that multiple people are working on the same subject
even if that sometimes means multiple
On 13.06.2012 10:31, Philippe Marschall wrote:
On 06/13/2012 04:44 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hi, hardcore hackers.
please take a look at the code and tell if it can be improved.
The AsmJit snippet below transforms an unicode integer value
to 1..4-byte sequence of utf-8
then the outer piece of
On 06/13/2012 11:40 AM, Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote:
On 13.06.2012 10:31, Philippe Marschall wrote:
On 06/13/2012 04:44 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hi, hardcore hackers.
please take a look at the code and tell if it can be improved.
The AsmJit snippet below transforms an unicode integer value
On 13 June 2012 11:40, Henrik Sperre Johansen
henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no wrote:
On 13.06.2012 10:31, Philippe Marschall wrote:
On 06/13/2012 04:44 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hi, hardcore hackers.
please take a look at the code and tell if it can be improved.
The AsmJit snippet below
On 13 June 2012 10:31, Philippe Marschall
philippe.marsch...@netcetera.ch wrote:
On 06/13/2012 04:44 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hi, hardcore hackers.
please take a look at the code and tell if it can be improved.
The AsmJit snippet below transforms an unicode integer value
to 1..4-byte
On 06/13/2012 02:59 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 13 June 2012 10:31, Philippe Marschall
philippe.marsch...@netcetera.ch wrote:
On 06/13/2012 04:44 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hi, hardcore hackers.
please take a look at the code and tell if it can be improved.
The AsmJit snippet below transforms
Hi, hardcore hackers.
please take a look at the code and tell if it can be improved.
The AsmJit snippet below transforms an unicode integer value
to 1..4-byte sequence of utf-8
then the outer piece of code (which is not yet written) will
accumulate the results of this snippet
to do a
14 matches
Mail list logo
