[Pharo-project] FilePlugin rant

2012-03-01 Thread Camillo Bruni
I recently started to hack around Monticello due to very low response times when having a huge package cache. Now interestingly the FilePlugin primitives for listing files are horrible! Example: --- MC often requests a list of all mzc's

Re: [Pharo-project] FilePlugin rant

2012-03-01 Thread Camillo Bruni
Hi Sven, I did a quick test with Igor by removing all unnecessary code in FileDirectory #directoryContentsFor:do: and you will see that just running #primLookupEntryIn:index: will take 100% of the time. best cami On 2012-03-01, at 11:14, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: Camillo, On 01 Mar

Re: [Pharo-project] FilePlugin rant

2012-03-01 Thread Philippe Marschall
On 03/01/2012 11:14 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: Camillo, On 01 Mar 2012, at 10:54, Camillo Bruni wrote: I recently started to hack around Monticello due to very low response times when having a huge package cache. Now interestingly the FilePlugin primitives for listing files are

Re: [Pharo-project] FilePlugin rant

2012-03-01 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
Hi Cami. This is a useless email but I just wanted to say that I have also experimented the problem of Monticello being unusable with large package-cache. So...whatever you can do to improve it, I will be very very happy. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Camillo Bruni

Re: [Pharo-project] FilePlugin rant

2012-03-01 Thread Marcus Denker
On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: I have also experimented the problem of Monticello being unusable The sentence should stop here... We really need to think hard about Monticello... just look at 1.4 from

Re: [Pharo-project] FilePlugin rant

2012-03-01 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Marcus let us know kills all the dragons at the same time. We will get there and kill them ALL but ONE BY ONE. Dale is working on git and probably git will solve the history metadata for us :). Now I would love to see 1.4 getting beta and green bar. Stef On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Marcus