Comment #5 on issue 3291 by aplantec: Missing text field with completion
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3291
In PharoInbox
SLICE-Issue-3291-Missing-text-field-with-completion
Updates:
Status: Closed
Comment #6 on issue 3291 by marcus.denker: Missing text field with
completion
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3291
12265
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-1.2
Comment #3 on issue 3291 by aplantec: Missing text field with completion
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3291
yes.
In PharoTaskForces:
last version of SLICE-Issue-3291-Missing-text-field-with-completion.
Reasonably tested and documented.
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 3291 by aplantec: Missing text field with completion
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3291
(No comment was entered for this change.)
tx alain
this is important to improve basic widgets because they will have a big impact.
Stef
On Nov 25, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Alain Plantec wrote:
Hi Lukas,
ok, I've plugged the textfield with completion (surely a bad name) in the
find class for testing only.
I don't like the two lists
So, its a basic widget which, afaik is missing and that could be used with
ob-tools.
I don't follow what you and Francisco are saying.
IMHO there is a much better widget already in OB. I suggest to make
that a standard widget so that other tools outside of OB can take
advantage too.
It is
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-1.2
Comment #2 on issue 3291 by marcus.denker: Missing text field with
completion
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3291
Not for 1.2?
Le 25/11/2010 12:03, Lukas Renggli a écrit :
So, its a basic widget which, afaik is missing and that could be used with
ob-tools.
I don't follow what you and Francisco are saying.
IMHO there is a much better widget already in OB.
sorry but why much better?
OBCompletionRequest is a dialog.
sorry but why much better?
OBCompletionRequest is a dialog.
What I propose is to enrich PluggableTextFieldMorph
Ahh, ok. I had the impression you somehow integrated eCompletion into
text fields.
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
On Nov 25, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote:
Hi, as ppl use to say a picture is worth a thousand words (or two thousands
in bad written english)
Imho it should look like this, without the static list and with recently used
on top :)
why because I most of the time look
WITH recently used on top
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr
wrote:
On Nov 25, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote:
Hi, as ppl use to say a picture is worth a thousand words (or two
thousands in bad written english)
Imho it should
On Nov 25, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote:
WITH recently used on top
Ok I see :)
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr
wrote:
On Nov 25, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote:
Hi, as ppl use to say a picture is
Le 25/11/2010 22:08, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
On Nov 25, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote:
WITH recently used on top
Ok I see :)
yes but you have to enter some text to see the list...
so, Lukas's dialog is better for such a fonctionality
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM,
The OB widget is quite nice and snappy. Just for reference, there is also a
nice search widget in Gaucho. Fernando said that he would package it
separately, but I do not know what the status is.
Cheers,
Doru
On 25 Nov 2010, at 23:19, Alain Plantec wrote:
Le 25/11/2010 22:08, Stéphane
Status: Accepted
Owner: aplantec
Labels: Milestone-1.2
New issue 3291 by aplantec: Missing text field with completion
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3291
Could be added as an instrumentation of PluggableTextFieldMorph.
Comment #1 on issue 3291 by aplantec: Missing text field with completion
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3291
In PharoTaskForces:
SLICE-Issue-3291-Missing-text-field-with-completion
For testing.
Not documented.
Test it with the findClass dialog which now makes use of a
Why two lists when one list is enough?
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/ob-completion-dialog
Lukas
On 24 November 2010 19:08, Alain Plantec alain.plan...@free.fr wrote:
Dear list,
I'm not should it's enough clear so
a screenshot is attached.
Cheers
Alain
--
Lukas Renggli
I was wondering the same, the top static list dosn't make any sense to me.
Like the one when you add a category.
Francisco
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Lukas Renggli reng...@gmail.com wrote:
Why two lists when one list is enough?
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/ob-completion-dialog
I would like to add that just watched Lukas ob-completion-dialog and the
PluggableTextFieldMorph autocomplete looks better for me.
From an usability point of view it looks more like OSX Spotlight or web
autocomplete on html input elements users are used to.
Cheers,
Francisco
On Thu, Nov 25,
Hi Lukas,
ok, I've plugged the textfield with completion (surely a bad name) in
the find class for testing only.
I don't like the two lists also.
The purpose is to have a normal text field which popup a list of
possible answers only
when you typin something in the field.
So, its a basic
20 matches
Mail list logo
