dale could you publish your code and open a BT entry so that a person
with a better understanding of the implications than me
can comment on it?
On Aug 7, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote:
Stef,
I'm not sure that concurrent use of the ThreadSafe Transcript is any
more or less
Will do...
Dale
- Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
| dale could you publish your code and open a BT entry so that a person
|
| with a better understanding of the implications than me
| can comment on it?
| On Aug 7, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote:
|
| Stef,
|
|
I'm trying to characterize some differences in behavior for GemTools between
Squeak and the 1.0beta for Pharo. I'm not reporting a bug as much as trying to
understand what I need to do differently in Pharo.
In GemTools, I have a special workspace (GemTools Launcher), that causes doits
to be
2009/8/7 Dale Henrichs dale.henri...@gemstone.com:
I'm trying to characterize some differences in behavior for GemTools between
Squeak and the 1.0beta for Pharo. I'm not reporting a bug as much as trying
to understand what I need to do differently in Pharo.
In GemTools, I have a special
Igor,
I appreciate what you are saying and in the fullness of time, we may be able to
do more things with background processes.
However, we _are_ running a development environment for GemStone that should
appear to the user to be no different than the Pharo development environment
... i.e.,
2009/8/7 Dale Henrichs dale.henri...@gemstone.com:
Igor,
I appreciate what you are saying and in the fullness of time, we may be able
to do more things with background processes.
Sure :)
However, we _are_ running a development environment for GemStone that should
appear to the user to be
I m not really satisfied of what I did but I think that this is
important to have a thread safe transcript.
Now I have the impression that the Morphic concurrency model could
really be rethought.
I'm not good enough with process and the rest but I got so burnt by it
(I had to cancel
Stef,
I'm not sure that concurrent use of the ThreadSafe Transcript is any more or
less dangerous from the foreground process than from background process.
I've experimented with a mod to ThreadSafeTranscriptendEntry that allows for
both foreground and background updating of the transcript.
I do not know (and I'm too tired now to have an opinion).
My goal is that if someone plays with Semaphore, mutex in a workspace
that the results on the transcript still
shows the reality of the thread switching.
I will go to bed and think about it. ;)
Stef
On Aug 7, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Dale
