I don't have time to scan the mailing list in detail. Was there any discussion
that led to this change? Any pointers appreciated. I always thought the comfort
of being able to chain selectors like add: outweighs the uniformity.
Norbert
On 08.05.2010, at 17:31, stephane ducasse wrote:
if
consistency
and this is linked to the work of nicolas to do the same in Squeak.
Stef
On May 10, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
I don't have time to scan the mailing list in detail. Was there any
discussion that led to this change? Any pointers appreciated. I always
thought the
if somebody wants to check that the fixes I made are ok
and that at:put: and add: return their arguments
addReturnValue.1.cs
Description: Binary data
Stef___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
That looks good to me. If no additional tests break after loading it,
I guess it should be clear to integrate. It is important to have a
uniform protocol. We should do the same for #nextPut: and #nextPutAll:
Lukas
2010/5/8 stephane ducasse stephane.duca...@free.fr:
if somebody wants to check
Tx!
Soon in the update.
On May 8, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
That looks good to me. If no additional tests break after loading it,
I guess it should be clear to integrate. It is important to have a
uniform protocol. We should do the same for #nextPut: and #nextPutAll:
Lukas
