On Feb 28, 2011, at 2:08 AM, Carla F. Griggio wrote:
I'll try it with smallUML, it would be great to link diagrams to a package
instead of a special class like it's done now :)
But pay attention the package is an object and you will still need to put the
spec of your diagram somewhere.
And
I'll try it with smallUML, it would be great to link diagrams to a package
instead of a special class like it's done now :)
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:07 PM, jannik.laval jannik.la...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
There is also a nighty build in hudson server.
Cheers,
Jannik
On Feb 26, 2011, at
Hi guys
I would like to give a try to introduce RPackage = a complete rewrite of
PackageInfo.
Moose people use it and I will sync with them to know.
It would be great if some of you could load and play with the system
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'PharoInbox';
package:
Hi,
We use RPackage in Moose, and it works fine. We only encountered a small
problem raised when renaming a class, but Cyrille fixed that, too. I am quite
confident in it.
The way to load it is like this (different repo):
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'PharoTaskForces';
package:
On Feb 26, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
We use RPackage in Moose, and it works fine. We only encountered a small
problem raised when renaming a class, but Cyrille fixed that, too. I am quite
confident in it.
The way to load it is like this (different repo):
Gofer new
Hi,
There is also a nighty build in hudson server.
Cheers,
Jannik
On Feb 26, 2011, at 21:48 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Feb 26, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
We use RPackage in Moose, and it works fine. We only encountered a small
problem raised when renaming a class,
