[Pharo-project] what do we do with SoundService?

2013-03-10 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Hi guy Sound has an AbstractSoundSystem and a Base and Dummy. Then in addition there is SounService. SoundService is not doing much soundEnabled ^ self defaultSoundEnabled defaultSoundEnabled ^DefaultSoundEnabled ifNil: [false] toggleSoundEnabling self soundEnabled:

Re: [Pharo-project] what do we do with SoundService?

2013-03-10 Thread Pavel Krivanek
Hi, removal of this class is proposed in https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6996 -- Pavel On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote: Hi guy Sound has an AbstractSoundSystem and a Base and Dummy. Then in addition there is SounService.

Re: [Pharo-project] what do we do with SoundService?

2013-03-10 Thread stephane ducasse
Sounds ok for me. We should do that for 3.0alpha :) Now I do not care about Beeper removal. I will split sound in different packages because there are sound and score and these are different domains. Stef On Mar 10, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Pavel Krivanek pavel.kriva...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,

Re: [Pharo-project] what do we do with SoundService?

2013-03-10 Thread p...@highoctane.be
e.g. of sound being useful: With the help of Craig Latta, I've been trying out Spoon. There is a remote browser for browsing classes remotely. Well, sound cues while things are transferred over the network are very useful when debugging. That's why sound matters in the core of Pharo. And Beeper

Re: [Pharo-project] what do we do with SoundService?

2013-03-10 Thread stephane ducasse
That's why sound matters in the core of Pharo. And Beeper may be interesting too. yes! what I mean is that to have Beeper is not a problem to me. But I see what pavel means: no need for SoundSystem and Beeper. Phil 2013/3/10 stephane ducasse stephane.duca...@free.fr: Sounds ok for