Without a doubt, the Edison phonograph playing a paper label records. Why
should they be excluded? They met the criteria of being an internal horn
acoustic phonograph.
Bruce
gee, when i read this, i remembered a little thing i wrote about 15 years
ago. googled around and guess what, it's still out there on the web!
http://www.shellac.org/wams/wpete08.html
bob waltrip was the guy who told me the phrase about the DD sound
following you down the hall. my, time flies.
, April 11, 2006 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
gee, when i read this, i remembered a little thing i wrote about 15 years
ago. googled around and guess what, it's still out there on the web!
http://www.shellac.org/wams/wpete08.html
bob waltrip was the guy who told me
...@alamedanet.net
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
gee, when i read this, i remembered a little thing i wrote about 15 years
ago. googled around and guess what, it's still out there on the web!
http
comments interspersed below...
Dan Kjeldgaard wrote:
Bob also totally scr()wed me with Orthophonic and Edison rebuilds.
Perhaps he'd lost his alleged touch by then, but both were the worst
botch-jobs ever heard by my ears. Sad.
i'd not heard of this. most folks were polarized either for or
In a message dated 4/11/2006 6:18:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
esrobe...@hotmail.com writes:
If you want slam,
Credenza. If you want the performers in the room with you, Edisonic.
When did J. Gordon Holt and Harry Pearson enter this discussion?
(If I have to take the Audiophile
by a person
well known in our hobby, afterward. Not charitable, so I won't mention the
name. :)
- Original Message -
From: pjfra...@alamedanet.net
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
I'd give just about anything to hear some low-key store-stock electrical
DD's on a C-250. *sigh*
r.
- Original Message -
From: diamondisk...@aol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
I was so distracted
JGH and Pearson?? Why Randy, I'm honored by the comparison. ;-) And damn
right those Von Schweikerts are glorious.
r.
- Original Message -
From: diamondisk...@aol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
comments interspersed below...
Dan Kjeldgaard wrote:
Bob also totally scr()wed me with Orthophonic and Edison rebuilds.
Perhaps he'd lost his alleged touch by then, but both were
pjfra...@alamedanet.net
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
no, you're not very charitable at all, are you.
On Apr 11, 2006, at 9:05 PM, Dan Kjeldgaard wrote:
Well, after receiving garbage from
Fraser pjfra...@alamedanet.net
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
no, you're not very charitable at all, are you.
On Apr 11, 2006, at 9:05 PM, Dan Kjeldgaard wrote:
Well, after receiving
Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
gee, i dunno. slandering a dead guy just doesn't seem right. but
maybe it's ok for you, because he can't answer back.
he had a lot of problems and he pissed off a lot
impossible claims, and delivered nothing more.
Whatever success
he had must have been by pure chance.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Fraser pjfra...@alamedanet.net
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
well, congratulations then, you finally got your money's worth by
airing it all out in a public forum. hope you feel better.
On Apr 12, 2006, at 12:50 AM, Dan
: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
gee, i dunno. slandering a dead guy just doesn't seem right. but
maybe it's ok for you, because he can't answer back.
he had a lot of problems and he pissed off a lot of people, but he
also was way more dedicated to these old phonos than most of us
could
pjfra...@alamedanet.net
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
if calling a guy a bitter old cripple isn't slander to you, i'd
hate to hear how you speak of your enemies. and even
.
You are right on point, Randy.
Greg Caringi
From: diamondisk...@aol.com
Reply-To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:50:57 EDT
In a message dated 4/11/2006 6:18:15 P.M. Eastern
-Original Message-
From: Robert Wright esrobe...@hotmail.com
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:29:55 -0500
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
I'd give just about anything to hear some low-key store-stock electrical
DD's on a C-250. *sigh
, and that's the point of our hobby.
Nice is nice, yes? Accusing people of slander is possibly less
than nice,
no? Yes.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Fraser
To: Antique Phonograph List
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
reproducers, and move
on. Life is too short for unnecessary, and ultimately pointless acrimony.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Kjeldgaard ediso...@verizon.net
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 02:06:53 -0400
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
OK Folks, let's remember to keep the list civil.
The wife and I are off to Denver this afternoon to visit with our
Colorado phono friends. If I decide not to take my laptop along, I'll
'see' you all in a week.
Loran
Have fun, Loran. Leave the laptop at home.
Randy
-Original Message-
From: Loran T. Hughes lo...@oldcrank.com
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 07:20:41 -0700
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
OK Folks, let's remember to keep
HI ALL
I HAD HIM REBUILD MY OPERA REPRODUCER AND A DIAMOND DISK ABOUT SIX MONTHS
BEFORE HE DIED
BOTH SOUNDED GREAT AND THE TONE WAS JUST A BIT HIGHER THAN A FRIENDS WHO HAD
NOT HAD HIS DONE BY BOB
YOU COULD HEAR THE HIGHS BETTER ON MINE
THE ONLY PROBLEM I HAD WAS THE DIAMOND WAS NOT FIRMLY
.
- Original Message -
From: diamondisk...@aol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
In a message dated 4/13/2006 3:49:58 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
steve_nor...@msn.com writes:
This is very interesting, Edison
Effect,
but isn't the patent Thom's as well?
thanks,
r.
- Original Message -
From: diamondisk...@aol.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
In a message dated 4/13/2006 3:49:58 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
, 2006 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Best sounding Phonograph
In a message dated 4/13/2006 9:11:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
esrobe...@hotmail.com writes:
I know it's still called the Edison Effect,
but isn't the patent Thom's as well?
That I do not know. I do know that Lee De Forest
27 matches
Mail list logo
