Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61481&edit=1

 ID:                 61481
 Patch added by:     mattfic...@php.net
 Reported by:        mattfic...@php.net
 Summary:            Test Bug - ext/com_dotnet/tests/bug49192
 Status:             Open
 Type:               Bug
 Package:            Testing related
 Operating System:   Windows
 PHP Version:        5.3.10
 Block user comment: N
 Private report:     N

 New Comment:

The following patch has been added/updated:

Patch Name: bug49192
Revision:   1332450831
URL:        
https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=61481&patch=bug49192&revision=1332450831


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-03-22 21:13:29] mattfic...@php.net

Description:
------------
Expected result:
----------------
test pass

Actual result:
--------------
test fail
001+ Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'com_exception' with message 'Failed to 
create COM object `ADODB.Connection': The specified module could not be found.
001- int(0)
002+ ' in C:\php-sdk\php-5.3-src-r324324\ext\com_dotnet\tests\bug49192.php:15
003+ Stack trace:
004+ #0 C:\php-sdk\php-5.3-src-r324324\ext\com_dotnet\tests\bug49192.php(15): 
com->com('ADODB.Connectio...')
005+ #1 {main}
006+   thrown in 
C:\php-sdk\php-5.3-src-r324324\ext\com_dotnet\tests\bug49192.php on line 15


This test fails to load ADO (using COM).

The patch marks it as XFAIL and provides this info.

A change in windows longhorn x64(affecting vista, 7, 8, 2008, 2008r2) broke ADO.

There is a fix available, but user has to install it.

Given that ADO was deprecated a long time ago in favor of newer APIs, I don't 
think its worth the trouble of making the user install the fix to get an 
accurate test run. its better to just not run the test or expect it to fail.

see: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2517589
see: http://www.infoq.com/news/2011/10/ADO-Win7




------------------------------------------------------------------------



-- 
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61481&edit=1

Reply via email to