Richard Davey wrote:
Hello Jochem,
Friday, April 22, 2005, 8:13:15 AM, you wrote:
JM in a round about way he seems to be asking 'why'? which is not
JM totally invalid.
To be honest when I ask people why? I actually use that word (or at
least something closely related to it).
JM do you want/need a
though.
Or you can just host the SQL server at the master. All queries goes to the
master.
Hope this helps!
-Leon
- Original Message -
From: Drewcore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: php php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: 1 web site, 3 servers
Richard Davey wrote:
Hello Satyam,
Thursday, April 21, 2005, 5:07:52 PM, you wrote:
S My domain, satyam.com.ar, though supposedly in Argentina resides in Spain,
S where I currently live hundreds of kilometers away from it, which I mention
S to point out that domain names do not correlate to
:13
To: Richard Davey
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: 1 web site, 3 servers, 3 countries - best
practises?
Richard Davey wrote:
Hello Satyam,
Thursday, April 21, 2005, 5:07:52 PM, you wrote:
S My domain, satyam.com.ar, though supposedly in Argentina resides in
S Spain
Hello Drewcore / Jochem,
Friday, April 22, 2005, 4:45:37 AM, you wrote:
D are you talking about having one server in south america that acts
D as your database server, one server in asia that's your web server,
D and then another server in north america that servers some other
D task?
Not
Hello Jochem,
Friday, April 22, 2005, 8:13:15 AM, you wrote:
JM in a round about way he seems to be asking 'why'? which is not
JM totally invalid.
To be honest when I ask people why? I actually use that word (or at
least something closely related to it).
JM do you want/need a master/slave
Richard Davey wrote:
Hello Jochem,
Friday, April 22, 2005, 8:13:15 AM, you wrote:
JM in a round about way he seems to be asking 'why'? which is not
JM totally invalid.
To be honest when I ask people why? I actually use that word (or at
least something closely related to it).
JM do you want/need a
On Fri, April 22, 2005 4:29 am, Richard Davey said:
This isn't about redundancy, it's about enhancing the experience for
customers physically located thousands of miles away from the server
they are trying to access. So, bring the content closer to them and
drop their wait times massively.
This isn't about redundancy, it's about enhancing the experience for
customers physically located thousands of miles away from the server
they are trying to access. So, bring the content closer to them and
drop their wait times massively. It's easy for those of us sat on the
end of cable
My domain, satyam.com.ar, though supposedly in Argentina resides in Spain,
where I currently live hundreds of kilometers away from it, which I mention
to point out that domain names do not correlate to physical locations.
Unless there is a political issue regarding who owns the actual machine
Hello Satyam,
Thursday, April 21, 2005, 5:07:52 PM, you wrote:
S My domain, satyam.com.ar, though supposedly in Argentina resides in Spain,
S where I currently live hundreds of kilometers away from it, which I mention
S to point out that domain names do not correlate to physical locations.
S
well, i guess it all depends...
are you talking about having one server in south america that acts as
your database server, one server in asia that's your web server, and
then another server in north america that servers some other task?
or are you talking about having a localized database,
12 matches
Mail list logo
