Hi, I'm taking a closer look at the '$' low level trace function. In the ref. I read that "if a method is traced, it [the first argument] is a cons pair of message and class. However, when I try this, I also get to see a representation of the object, but I have trouble understanding where that information is comming from. I can do a very simple case like this:
(class +C) (dm m> () NIL) (setq X (new '(+C))) -> $349014 (trace 'm> '+C) (m> X) m> +C $349014 : m> +C $349014 = NIL -> NIL As you can see, the trace not only shows the message/method 'm>' and the class '+C', but also the object '$349014' (my X). I wanted to investigate this by replacing the '$' function involved by one of my own, like this: (de dol Args (println Args) NIL) (setq $ dol) ... but when I did (m> X) again, I got this: ((m> . +C) NIL NIL) -> NIL ... No trace of my object '$349014' here, just the cons pair mentioned in the ref. docs. Can somebody explain where the '$' function is getting its object information from? /Jon -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
