Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-10 Thread Richard Z
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:54:06PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: Hi, > However, I do not understand what you mean with "totally inconsistent and > obsolete set of pages". Can you explain? I installed one example, looked at options/PILs. Then installed another example and somehow got the old

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-10 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Richard, > works thus far. > > One problem that I notice is that the UI gets totally confused with both the > device back arrow and the PilBox own back/forward arrows. Device back arrow > apparently exits the app. Right. This is the standard Android behavior of the device back arrow, and I

Re: PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-10 Thread Richard Z
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:50:08PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: Hi, > PilBox now also runs on Android/Arm32 (albeit a bit slower), via the > installation of an "Architecture Plugin". thanks, wanted to do it myself but was too lazy:) > This is simply a ZIP file, just like the "normal"

PilBox support for Arm32 CPUs

2017-11-10 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi all, PilBox now also runs on Android/Arm32 (albeit a bit slower), via the installation of an "Architecture Plugin". This is simply a ZIP file, just like the "normal" PilBox Apps. It needs to be installed before starting PilBox the first time (otherwise PilBox complains about wrong CPU and