Re: A possible way to build for windows

2019-02-26 Thread C K Kashyap
Thanks Alex - I'll try and do the translation to nasm and can validate it on Linux itself (without removing anything). Hey Joe ... yeah, WSL is really not an option for the use case where I'd like to share scripts that I'd like to share. Thanks for the link though - I was not aware of running

Re: A possible way to build for windows

2019-02-26 Thread Joe Bogner
Hi Kashyap, I've been interested in a picolisp port to Windows for several years. I've tried a number of different options. My last effort was to use https://midipix.org/ as the POSIX layer. It worked OK but then midipix seemed to lose steam with Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) coming out. Now,

Re: A possible way to build for windows

2019-02-26 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Kashyap, > I feel pretty sure that I should be able to translate the .s into nasm > syntax fairly mechanically. I have done similar things before. What I love > about nasm is that there is no ceremony code :) I see. Nice! > @Alex - I have a follow up question about POSIX requirement - To