Mansur Mamkin mmam...@mail.ru writes:
in case of Windows don't forget to look at coLinux and andLinux:
Isn't archlinux quite popular now between 'minimalists'?
,---
| https://www.archlinux.org/
`---
--
cheers,
Thorsten
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
If VM can't be avoided isn't Gentoo more minimal than Arch?
http://www.gentoo.org/
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com wrote:
Mansur Mamkin mmam...@mail.ru writes:
in case of Windows don't forget to look at coLinux and andLinux:
Isn't archlinux quite popular
Bikeshedding! Debian.
Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com skrev:
If VM can't be avoided isn't Gentoo more minimal than Arch?
http://www.gentoo.org/
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com wrote:
Mansur Mamkin mmam...@mail.ru writes:
in case of Windows don't forget
Hi,
I installed the latest ongoing (v3.1.0.12) on my iMac, and compared
the timing results of (bench (fibo 33)). Not too useful, I was just
curious. ;-)
pil32: 0.804 sec
emu64: 10.032 sec
My EmuLisp in Safari: 5.82 sec
My EmuLisp in Chrome: 8.102 sec
My EmuLisp in Chromium: 8.261 sec
The
Hi Jon,
I installed the latest ongoing (v3.1.0.12) on my iMac, and
compared the timing results of (bench (fibo 33)). Not too useful, I
was just curious. ;-)
Yeah, interesting :)
pil32: 0.804 sec
emu64: 10.032 sec
My EmuLisp in Safari: 5.82 sec
My EmuLisp in Chrome: 8.102 sec
My
I ran a similar test the other day. Here are my timings with (fibo 33) and
(cFibo 33)
I'm including cFibo (since I can now run it on emu64) and ersatz.
emu64: 21.632 sec
emu64/cFibo: 0.111 sec
pil32: 4.477 sec
ersatz: 12.797 sec
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Alexander Burger
