Hi Bruno,
> I didn't know about picolisp's tolerance for nested symbols. Is there a
> reason you chose this?
> Like, it lets you write some cool code, or it makes the language more
> robust?
Not at all. It is the very basic functionality of the interpreter. Without it,
nothing would work. The
Thanks Alex.
I didn't know about picolisp's tolerance for nested symbols. Is there a
reason you chose this?
Like, it lets you write some cool code, or it makes the language more
robust?
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Alexander Burger
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> while talking
Hi all,
while talking about 'set' and 'setq', let me clarify another issue. Quite often
I see here - or in IRC - expressions like
(mapc 'set '(A B C) (1 2 3))
or
(mapcar 'inc (4 5 6))
While this certainly works, it is actually wrong, or at least unnecessary.
The mapping functions want