Hi Peter,
not sure why but your email was displayed as empty by my mail reader.
It has happened a few times before with other people's emails so I
wonder what the problem could be?
If there was a more liberal gpl-2 (think %s(must(should(g ) this would
be fine - anybody could use it for
Hi Alex,
The BSD license is _less_ restricted.
I think it depends on your definition of less restrictive. BSD
licence is actually more restrictive from the users point of view,
e.g. somebody can take it and restrict or block users access to the
modified source code.
Giving away per se is not
Hi Tomas,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 09:16:12AM +0200, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
I think it depends on your definition of less restrictive. BSD
licence is actually more restrictive from the users point of view,
e.g. somebody can take it and restrict or block users access to the
modified source code.
On 03.08.2010 09:31, Alexander Burger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 09:16:12AM +0200, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
Agreed, but the new licence would encurage taking away as opposed to
giving away.
I don't think so. If somebody takes it, modifies it, or does whatever
she likes, it does in no
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Peter Fischer wrote:
some kind of embrace and extend (like what happened to kerberos
after win 2k), so that the market would later force you to support
industry standards, parts of which are patented and/or expensive.
Oops, that's tough.
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Peter Fischer wrote:
So if you want some part/aspect of picolisp to be free and open
forever, put these files unter LGPL and the rest under BSD.
Thinking more about this, I must say that probably there isn't anything
which can be protected.
What is
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Thinking more about this, I must say that probably there isn't anything
which can be protected.
What is PicoLisp? A collection of ideas, data structures, language
constructs, perhaps a programming philosophy.
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:29:52AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi all,
as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will surely
pop up in the future: What do you think if PicoLisp were released under
the BSD license instead of GPL?
I would love it. I could imagine embedding
Hi Alex, all,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi all,
as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will surely
pop up in the future: What do you think if PicoLisp were released under
the BSD license instead of GPL?
i go for BSD.
Hi all,
Hi all,
as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will surely
pop up in the future: What do you think if PicoLisp were released under
the BSD license instead of GPL?
Why not? It would be great to see PicoLisp under BDS license
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
Hi all,
Hi all,
as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will surely
pop up in the future: What do you think if PicoLisp were released under
the BSD license instead of GPL?
Why not? It would be great to see PicoLisp under BDS license
Oops, sorry, I mean BSD
--
Hello.
Does the GPL affect code that I write that runs on PicoLisp, or just
changes to the PicoLisp interpreter?
If only changes to the interpreter are affected, than GPL is the way
to go as far as I am concerned.
However, I should add that many large companies (at least in the US)
are
Hi Dan, all,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Daniel Elliott danelliotts...@gmail.com w=
rote:
Hello.
Does the GPL affect code that I write that runs on PicoLisp, or just
changes to the PicoLisp interpreter?
picoLisp is made up of 1) the interpreter and 2) libraries and support
files that
El Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:20:06 +0800
Edwin Eyan Moragas e...@yndy.org escribi=C3=B3:
Hi Alex, all,
=20
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Alexander Burger
a...@software-lab.de wrote:
Hi all,
as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will
surely pop up in the future: What do
Hi Alex,
For me it is critical, as my economic survival depends on it.
Do you mean that your economic survival depends on changing the licence
to BSD? Then yes, because without you there is no PicoLisp;-)
What do you think if PicoLisp were released under the BSD license
instead of GPL?
Hi Tomas,
For me it is critical, as my economic survival depends on it.
Do you mean that your economic survival depends on changing the licence
to BSD? Then yes, because without you there is no PicoLisp;-)
No, it does not depend directly on the licensing issue ;-) But on
PicoLisp in
16 matches
Mail list logo
