Re: Pipe and http

2008-12-12 Thread Alexander Burger
Sorry friends, it was STILL not completely correct! :-( On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 07:09:06AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: Fixed! I uploaded a new testing version. Both effects were a result of the fact that 'pipe' did not write to the process' standard output as it should. Instead, it used

Pipe and http

2008-10-19 Thread Henrik Sarvell
the problem be that xml is outputting unchunked to pipe and the http server chokes on this? /Henrik -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pipe and http

2008-10-19 Thread Alexander Burger
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:04:12PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: Trying (trace 'pipe) in the server Ah, this does not work. Only normal functions (that evaluate all their arguments) can be traced. 'trace' is not intelligent enough to know how built-in functions evaluate their arguments.

Re: Pipe and http

2008-10-19 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Tomas, 'pipe' worked fine except when run in a server which returned NIL. This would indeed be a bug in the PicoLisp kernel. Do you think you can construct a simple, stand-alone example that demonstrates this effect? Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pipe and http

2008-10-19 Thread Henrik Sarvell
I'm trying to output a nested list to text, see the (trace 'pipe) output I copy pasted. Why do you think there might be a bug in the kernel? Obviously everything is working fine when we work in a non server context and as far as I know the http server is not a part of the kernel? Note also that

Re: Pipe and http

2008-10-19 Thread Tomas Hlavaty
in a server. Also, when using pipe version, the http output is messed up... Cheers, Tomas -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]