Hi Joe,
I uploaded the code but couldn't figure out how to link to it on the page.
I'm afraid this is not possible. The wiki supports only img and
Now I've added support for arbitrary files to the Wiki.
We could extend it for arbitrary mimetypes, but then I'm not sure which
tag to
Hi Alex - Great! I see the drawback with losing the name. For now I've
just added some text to instruct please rename to a zip. With such
cryptic file names it adds to the security by obscurity (hah!).
Reminds me of the old trick in email to have file foo.zip.rename to
suggest people to rename.
Hi Henrik, Thanks for the feedback!
Yes, I plan on extending it further. I fixed a small bug with having
to decode the urlencoded post variables (e.g. 'hello%20world').
At first I was stumped because ht:Pack is implemented in ht.c so there
wasn't a java implementation
(ht:Pack (chop
On January 31, 2012 at 11:19 AM Joe Bogner joebog...@gmail.com wrote:
worried about the security of it. Maybe if I were to pick a single
mimetype, I'd go with zip or tar.gz as that's the main reason someone
would upload if it's too much to paste in as a code example or to
include a
Hi Joe,
Hi Alex - Great! I see the drawback with losing the name. For now I've
just added some text to instruct please rename to a zip. With such
cryptic file names it adds to the security by obscurity (hah!).
Haha, yeah.
But, anyway, I've found a way. I generate a href which calls a
On January 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM Joe Bogner joebog...@gmail.com wrote:
I spent the weekend working on an example web app using ersatz. I've
written it up here: http://picolisp.com/5000/!wiki?ErsatzWebApp
Please let me know what you think
Awesome. I will bless it with the first bug report!
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:50:21AM -0500, Joe Bogner wrote:
I uploaded the code but couldn't figure out how to link to it on the page.
I'm afraid this is not possible. The wiki supports only img and
video tags for uploaded files so far. This distinction is done based
on the file's mimetype.
Hi Jakob,
There is no silver bullet for this problem. Even images could be malicious.
Yeah, that's right. But the wiki won't do anything with images or
videos, just push them to the browser. So I assume the wiki itself is
not in danger. Of course, there's no absolute security ;-)
Different
