Re: PL vs. BSD License

2010-08-02 Thread Jakob Eriksson
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:29:52AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: Hi all, as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will surely pop up in the future: What do you think if PicoLisp were released under the BSD license instead of GPL? I would love it. I could imagine embedding

Re: PL vs. BSD License

2010-08-02 Thread Edwin Eyan Moragas
Hi Alex, all, On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote: Hi all, as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will surely pop up in the future: What do you think if PicoLisp were released under the BSD license instead of GPL? i go for BSD.

Re: PL vs. BSD License

2010-08-02 Thread Mansur Mamkin
Hi all, Hi all, as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will surely pop up in the future: What do you think if PicoLisp were released under the BSD license instead of GPL? Why not? It would be great to see PicoLisp under BDS license -- UNSUBSCRIBE:

Re: PL vs. BSD License

2010-08-02 Thread Mansur Mamkin
Hi all, Hi all, as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will surely pop up in the future: What do you think if PicoLisp were released under the BSD license instead of GPL? Why not? It would be great to see PicoLisp under BDS license Oops, sorry, I mean BSD --

Re: PL vs. BSD License

2010-08-02 Thread Daniel Elliott
Hello. Does the GPL affect code that I write that runs on PicoLisp, or just changes to the PicoLisp interpreter? If only changes to the interpreter are affected, than GPL is the way to go as far as I am concerned. However, I should add that many large companies (at least in the US) are

Re: PL vs. BSD License

2010-08-02 Thread Edwin Eyan Moragas
Hi Dan, all, On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Daniel Elliott danelliotts...@gmail.com w= rote: Hello. Does the GPL affect code that I write that runs on PicoLisp, or just changes to the PicoLisp interpreter? picoLisp is made up of 1) the interpreter and 2) libraries and support files that

Re: PL vs. BSD License

2010-08-02 Thread José Romero
El Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:20:06 +0800 Edwin Eyan Moragas e...@yndy.org escribi=C3=B3: Hi Alex, all, =20 On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote: Hi all, as this discussion popped up recently and in the past, and will surely pop up in the future: What do

Re: PL vs. BSD License

2010-08-02 Thread Tomas Hlavaty
Hi Alex, For me it is critical, as my economic survival depends on it. Do you mean that your economic survival depends on changing the licence to BSD? Then yes, because without you there is no PicoLisp;-) What do you think if PicoLisp were released under the BSD license instead of GPL?

Re: PL vs. BSD License

2010-08-02 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Tomas, For me it is critical, as my economic survival depends on it. Do you mean that your economic survival depends on changing the licence to BSD? Then yes, because without you there is no PicoLisp;-) No, it does not depend directly on the licensing issue ;-) But on PicoLisp in