As seen here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_transactional_memory
I noticed that Common Lisp and other Lisps have support for transactional
memory.
I read this and became curious:
Hi Jakob,
As seen here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_transactional_memory
ATM I cannot see how this could be useful. PicoLisp has no threads, and
in the context of database transactions it seems to make no sense in
PicoLisp's object caching model.
Cheers,
- Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:04:21PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
ATM I cannot see how this could be useful. PicoLisp has no threads, and
If you defined threads less strict, such that processes could be threads,
could it make sense then?
Only if some shared/mapped memory is used, as far as I
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:57:49PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:04:21PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
ATM I cannot see how this could be useful. PicoLisp has no threads, and
If you defined threads less strict, such that processes could be
threads,
could it
