Hi Nehal,
Op ma 25 jun. 2018 om 13:29 schreef Nehal :
> While observing new changes made in picolisp wiki css, I observed on
> https://picolisp.com/wiki/?PCE:
>
> 1. *Numbering* error of headings. 3 comes after 4 again!
>
Corrected.
2. "On Rosettacode you can find a wealth of examples on a
Thx. Manuel!
Op ma 25 jun. 2018 om 14:09 schreef Manuel Cano :
> Hi,
>
> I've corrected the missing quote: ...known "Perl Cookbook.
>
> :)
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Manu
>
> 2018-06-01 17:19 GMT+02:00 Arie van Wingerden :
>
>> The first section of PLEAC (Strings) is now at about 76% ready
>>
>> Some
Hi,
I've corrected the missing quote: ...known "Perl Cookbook.
:)
Kind regards,
Manu
2018-06-01 17:19 GMT+02:00 Arie van Wingerden :
> The first section of PLEAC (Strings) is now at about 76% ready
>
> Some examples are rewritten a little, in order to make it easier for
> people to just copy
Hi Arie,
While observing new changes made in picolisp wiki css, I observed on
https://picolisp.com/wiki/?PCE:
1. *Numbering* error of headings. 3 comes after 4 again!
2. "On Rosettacode you can find a wealth of examples on a huge *scala*
of common programming problems." Perhaps you wanted to
Hi,
I think something like Picolisp wiki has to be clear and easy to read, not
necessarily (althought it is for me) "pretty", but practical. Don't be
picky.
The only thing I don't really like is to have code in bold. (We don't code
in bold!) But even if I don't really like it, I find making code
Hi Jean-Christophe,
Op ma 25 jun. 2018 om 12:04 schreef Jean-Christophe Helary <
brandel...@gmail.com>:
I agree. But it is always difficult to discuss a proposal before seeing
> some kind of implementation.
>
Right. Thtat's a thing I really need to change.!
> I think it is possible to
No problem :)
Op ma 25 jun. 2018 om 12:04 schreef Manuel Cano :
> Hi Arie,
>
> Sorry. I've mistyped you name!
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Manu
>
> 2018-06-25 11:41 GMT+02:00 Arie van Wingerden :
>
> > Hi Manuel,
> >
> > I like as it is now. Ari has made a good job, don't throw it away.
> >
> > Pffft.
Hi Arie,
Sorry. I've mistyped you name!
Kind regards,
Manu
2018-06-25 11:41 GMT+02:00 Arie van Wingerden :
> Hi Manuel,
>
> I like as it is now. Ari has made a good job, don't throw it away.
>
> Pffft. I really thought it was all bad news. Thx.
>
> If it was hard for someone before, they
> On Jun 25, 2018, at 18:03, Manuel Cano wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I like as it is now. Ari has made a good job, don't throw it away.
> If it was hard for someone before, they could have done what Ari has made.
I agree. But it is always difficult to discuss a proposal before seeing some
kind
Hi Johann,
I would also keep it
> ...
>
OK. You don't like the updates I guess.
>
> and somebody finds something annoying (like italic
> headlines) they should just send an "upgraded" css to the mailing list and
> have some people try it out.
>
It indeed would be nice *if* people did
I would also keep it and somebody finds something annoying (like italic
headlines) they should just send an "upgraded" css to the mailing list and
have some people try it out.
2018-06-25 11:03 GMT+02:00 Manuel Cano :
> Hi all,
>
> I like as it is now. Ari has made a good job, don't throw it
Hi Manuel,
I like as it is now. Ari has made a good job, don't throw it away.
Pffft. I really thought it was all bad news. Thx.
If it was hard for someone before, they could have done what Ari has made.
That's right. But it is *really* difficult to do things that everybody
likes ...
Thx!
Hi Alex,
might be a good Idea.
But the mailing list and IRC don't seem to be really appropriate to do
voting.
Does somebody know if there is a good free online possibility out there to
do voting on several things in one go?
If so, I am surely willing to take the effort and follow up
Hi all,
I like as it is now. Ari has made a good job, don't throw it away.
If it was hard for someone before, they could have done what Ari has made.
Kind regards,
Manuel
El lun., 25 jun. 2018 11:00, Alexander Burger
escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> > after reading a few reactions and also my
Hi all,
> after reading a few reactions and also my struggle to get things right (in
> *my* opinion), I realize that it really is impossible to please everybody.
>
> Given the fact that also I seem to be the only person not liking the old
> CSS and that the new CSS is a "regression" it is much
Hi Arie,
> - don't limit the page to use 60% of the browser window, it's a waste
> > of real-estate (too much whitespace on left/right). That technique
> > should be reserved for blogs/articles.
> >
>
> Well, that choice was made long ago by Alexander Burger himself. Nothing
> has changed.
Hi all,
after reading a few reactions and also my struggle to get things right (in
*my* opinion), I realize that it really is impossible to please everybody.
Given the fact that also I seem to be the only person not liking the old
CSS and that the new CSS is a "regression" it is much better to
Hi Nehal,
I see.Well, my biggest wish is to add more useful content than changing the
layout.
For me personally, the layout wasn't so nice. Guessing that this would be
the case for other people, I started to try to help.
Maybe we should wait for a while for all reactions.
Ultimate choice could
Hi Alexander,
I haven't been following the recent website changes, but right now it
> seems the picolisp.com website is much worse than it used to be. A
> regression.
>
Well, that is a blow to take in ...
> - text is too small. Please use browser relative sizes in "em" and "%"
> instead of
19 matches
Mail list logo
