Yeah, all foldl does in scheme or haskell is encapsulate this pattern. In
haskell and scheme they like it for being able to compose functions. For
example:
sum = foldl + 0
Perhaps not as useful in Picolisp, which is not exactly a functional
language in the same sense.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at
>
> Is there a PicoLisp function similar to the Scheme 'foldl'?
>
> See description here:
>
> https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/pairs.html?q=foldl#%28def._%28%28lib._racket%2Fprivate%2Flist
> .rkt%29._foldl%29%29
>
There is no foldl. This is too general and not required in core.
What you
