Re: Less powerful 'str?

2017-06-18 Thread Alexander Burger
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 05:39:15PM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote: > I think I found what I was looking for, modifying an example from the docs: > > : (mapcar pack (split (chop (line T)) " ")) Minor optimization: You can avoid the overhead of 'chop': (mapcar pack (split (line) " ")) > On

Re: Less powerful 'str?

2017-06-17 Thread Christopher Howard
I think I found what I was looking for, modifying an example from the docs: : (mapcar pack (split (chop (line T)) " ")) go north -> ("go" "north") On 06/17/2017 02:35 PM, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote: > Take a look at 'read. > You may need to 'eval the result. > If 'read does not suit your needs i wrote

Re: Less powerful 'str?

2017-06-17 Thread Joh-Tob Schäg
Take a look at 'read. You may need to 'eval the result. If 'read does not suit your needs i wrote a tokenizer and parser but the source code is not yet ready fot publication Am 17.06.2017 23:42 schrieb "Christopher Howard" < christopher.how...@qlfiles.net>: > Hi list. I find that the 'str

Less powerful 'str?

2017-06-17 Thread Christopher Howard
Hi list. I find that the 'str function is rather convenient for processing commands from the user, as it converts the input to list format, like in : (str (line T)) go north -> (go north) However, it creates complications in allowing commands like: : (str (line T)) `(+ 1 2 3) -> (6) and :