Hi Thorsten,
is it normal that a simple 'kill' won't kill PicoLisp processes, only
with option 'KILL it works?
No.
A normal kill with SIGTERM (i.e. -15) should work.
SIGKILL (i.e. -9) should be used only in extreme emergencies, because it
may cause the loss of data (resulting in a corrupted
Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de writes:
Hi Alex,
is it normal that a simple 'kill' won't kill PicoLisp processes, only
with option 'KILL it works?
No.
A normal kill with SIGTERM (i.e. -15) should work.
SIGKILL (i.e. -9) should be used only in extreme emergencies, because it
may
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:22:14 +0200
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com wrote:
..[snip]..
I ran into this problem when experimenting with the
web-framework and my app got into a bad state. When restarting then,
PicoLisp tells me something like 'Port is already used', so I tried
to kill the
Rowan Thorpe ro...@rowanthorpe.com writes:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:22:14 +0200
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com wrote:
..[snip]..
I ran into this problem when experimenting with the
web-framework and my app got into a bad state. When restarting then,
PicoLisp tells me something like 'Port
When developing web apps I keep the code for the server and the rest
separate and reload the rest on every request. No need for restarts at all
that way.
Unless you're actually fiddling with the actual server code, then it can't
be helped I suppose...
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Thorsten
Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com
writes:
Hi Henrik,
When developing web apps I keep the code for the server and the rest
separate and reload the rest on every request. No need for restarts at
all that way.
interesting idea, not sure how you actually do that, but would make
things smoother
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:14:11 +0700
Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com wrote:
When developing web apps I keep the code for the server and the rest
separate and reload the rest on every request. No need for restarts
at all that way.
Unless you're actually fiddling with the actual server
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 01:28:59PM +0300, Rowan Thorpe wrote:
..for such times (and for those times that you generally can't be so
organised), there is the sledgehammer approach - SO_REUSEADDR
Why sledgehammer approach? This is quite normal, as I see it.
The PicoLisp network functions always
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:56:35 +0200
Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 01:28:59PM +0300, Rowan Thorpe wrote:
..for such times (and for those times that you generally can't be so
organised), there is the sledgehammer approach - SO_REUSEADDR
Why
interesting idea ...
Through the http server you can call any PL function, in that function you
(load) stuff before doing what you need to do.
From the above it kind of follows that I use a single
bootstrap/entry/routing function, so I only need to do the loads there and
nowhere else.
On
Hi List,
is it normal that a simple 'kill' won't kill PicoLisp processes, only
with option 'KILL it works?
#+begin_quote
$ pidof picolisp
1658 1648 1380 1359
$ kill 1359 1380 1648 1658
$ pidof picolisp
1658 1648 1380 1359
$ sudo kill 1359 1380 1648 1658
[sudo] password for ME:
$ pidof
11 matches
Mail list logo
