Hi Tomas,
I don't (unfortunately) agree with the statement:
Windows is obsolete in all interesting segments, remaining only on
the desktop
It appears to me that it's significantly more relevant then any bsd or
sparc ports. Well, I kind of agree with the statement only because I
Hi Alex,
It appears to me that it's significantly more relevant then any bsd
or sparc ports.
Funny, yeasterday I hit upon the dietlibc:
Why not port the diet libc to *BSD?
- The BSD people are responsible for three thirds of the broken APIs
that plague Unix today. The rest can be
Hi Tomas,
When talking about interesting segments, I meant that the major
battlefields these days are either in the smartphones and tablet area,
with server (cloud) systems, or - traditionally (also in terms of
sheer numbers), but largely unnoticed by the consumer - embedded
systems.
If they target .NET I mean, I've heard you can get acceptable results on
that stack so some respect is due to those people.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry to have to say this but these people are only real programmers
if they don't target the
I'm sorry to have to say this but these people are only real programmers
if they don't target the MS stack with .NET etc, the whole WAMP, XAMPP posse
are just hobbyists and not a iota of energy should be spent to make their
lives easier.
They have to suffer, as much as possible.
On Thu, Sep 8,
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:42:22 +0700, Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm sorry to have to say this but these people are only real
programmers
if they don't target the MS stack with .NET etc, the whole WAMP, XAMPP
posse
are just hobbyists and not a iota of energy should be spent
Not per se but I would never try to make life easier for someone who is
afraid to let go of the teat for no other reason than that it's comfortable
sucking at it.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Jakob Eriksson ja...@vmlinux.org wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:42:22 +0700, Henrik Sarvell
