If `lambda' (Lisp-defined Procedures) is `lst' why `num' is not?!
Even if both `num' and `cnt' are defined in `structures', why `num'
can not be operated on as a `lst' that it is?!
I think it would be (uber cute) to implement `num' as `lst' of `cnt'
as pure PL lib :) . Even in 32-bit
Hello Todd Roth :-)
You are now subscribed
from my iPhone
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Hi Danilo,
> If `lambda' (Lisp-defined Procedures) is `lst' why `num' is not?!
I'm not completely sure how you mean that, but you can also "define" a number:
: +
-> 270167
: (def 'plus (- (* 2 135085) 3))
-> plus
: plus
-> 270167
: (plus 3 4)
-> 7
> Even if both
Hi Alex,
> > If `lambda' (Lisp-defined Procedures) is `lst' why `num' is not?!
>
> I'm not completely sure how you mean that, but you can also "define" a number:
[path "@src64/structures"] defines `num' as a list of ``cell's. How
to do `cons', `car' and `cdr' on it. Even shifting (`>\
>')
yes, I'm in a windows 10 64-bit PC.
I've cloned the repository you linked but when invoking make in src64
directory I got the same error messages
If I try to run pil in root picolisp-win-x86-64 directory I get an error
indicating picolisp not found in bin directroy, if I run pil in bin
directory
Hi pd, yes, this is a common issue with cygwin and fork.
Are you on a 64-bit bit PC? If so, I have an experimental version of
PicoLisp on 64-bit that might be useful -
https://github.com/joebo/picoLisp-win-x86-64
I can elaborate if so
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:22 PM, pd
If you get stuck, jump on #picolisp on irc.freenode.net
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Joe Bogner wrote:
> Building from my repo is complicated as it requires a different toolchain
Building from my repo is complicated as it requires a different toolchain.
It's best to try out the binary release
https://github.com/joebo/picoLisp-win-x86-64/releases
Clone the repo and then drop that picoLisp-win-x86-64-dist.zip into the
folder and unzip. You should be able to run pil.cmd