On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 02:06:05PM -0400, r...@tamos.net wrote:
Hi,
> Curious, if you gave Msys2 a try, as Mike was asking about here:
unfortunatley, msys2 (like cygwin) doesn't work with my wine installation
so I am out of luck for this project.
Also, it seems the float support of picolisp
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 12:21:39PM -0400, David Bloom wrote:
Hi,
> Hi Richard. If you want to get PicoLisp running on windows compilation can
> be difficult but you mention wine. What are you trying to run PicoLisp on,
> Linux, BSD? If you are willing to try using Docker containers I've made
Hi,
> It sounds like containers may be exactly what you want. The same
> development environment isolated from your host OS of choice. Docker
> containers run great on Linux and my understanding is that Windows is
> gaining/already has better support than the past. There's not much more
> work
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 02:00:51PM -0400, Joe Bogner wrote:
Hi Joe,
thanks for your answer.
> I'm not sure about mingw/cygwin but I do have an unofficial port of pil-64
> that runs on windows using midipix --
> https://github.com/joebo/picoLisp-win-x86-64
out of curiosity, does the 32bit port
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 02:06:05PM -0400, r...@tamos.net wrote:
Hi Rick,
> Curious, if you gave Msys2 a try, as Mike was asking about here:
>
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2017 13:07 +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> > Richard,
> >
> > I've compile picoLisp under msys (http://www.msys2.org/)
> > and 'ctl'
Hi,
noticed that the code still has
#ifdef __CYGWIN__
#include
#define fcntl(fd,cmd,fl) 0
#endif
- is this still necessary? Did anyone test it recently?
Regards,
Richard
--
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 11:04:16AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 04:42:32PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> > > Cool! So I can safely remove it? It looks ugly indeed ;)
> >
> > Looking at it, there are move such "ifndef __CYGWIN__" lines, besides the
> > above
> >
Hello Richard Z <r...@linux-m68k.org> :-)
You are now subscribed
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 02:56:44PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> finally, an official version of PilBox is out - and a Wiki article:
>
>https://picolisp.com/wiki/?PilBox
>
>
> PilBox ("PicoLisp Box") is a generic Android App which allows to write Apps in
> pure PicoLisp,
Hi,
> > I have an even older Moto G and was going to try various things.. now
> > it seems https://software-lab.de/PilBox.tgz doesn't include the actual
> > lisp engine sources. Which one should I take?
>
> Since 22th of September a pre-build Lisp env should be included.
well I assume I need to
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 03:26:52PM +, stayfirefo...@outlook.com wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> How can I access and receive signal from Camera and Microphone (and output
> signal to microphone) purely in PicoLisp?
in Linux webcams create device nodes, watch the output of dmesg.
To actually
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 08:44:12AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> > Is there any chance of a version that works with 32-bit Android? I have
> > a Moto G4+ which has a 64 bit cpu (Snapdragon 617 iirc) but uses a 32
> > bit Android build, so Pilbox sees it as an ARM 7l and won't
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 06:46:50PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Since 22th of September a pre-build Lisp env should be included.
> >
> > well I assume I need to compile my own since my Moto G identifies
> > itself as ARM 7?
>
> I thought you wrote
>
> > I have a Moto G4+ which
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:19:30PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:27:45PM +0100, Richard Z wrote:
> > > I won't think so, as this animation is driven by JavaScript (the '(+Click
> > > +Auto
> > > +Button) in "demo/fields.l"), w
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 08:45:01AM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:25:26PM +0100, Richard Z wrote:
> > I installed one example, looked at options/PILs. Then installed another
> > example and somehow got the old page listing the PILs as they were in the
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:50:08PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi,
> PilBox now also runs on Android/Arm32 (albeit a bit slower), via the
> installation of an "Architecture Plugin".
thanks, wanted to do it myself but was too lazy:)
> This is simply a ZIP file, just like the "normal"
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:54:06PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi,
> However, I do not understand what you mean with "totally inconsistent and
> obsolete set of pages". Can you explain?
I installed one example, looked at options/PILs. Then installed another
example and somehow got the old
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 03:49:45PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:10:33PM +0100, Richard Z wrote:
> > it happened when I downloaded the zips with Firefox. I have no idea if I
> > have
> > closed PilBox properly before, will try again. The
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:19:30PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:27:45PM +0100, Richard Z wrote:
> > > I won't think so, as this animation is driven by JavaScript (the '(+Click
> > > +Auto
> > > +Button) in "demo/fields.l"), w
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:04:43PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Yes. The Android way, by calling 'getFilesDir().getPath();'. This gives the
> absolute path to the app's working directory, and then it is called with
> a relative path "bin/picolisp" (plus the initial *.l files).
maybe the
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:30:35PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Anyone here who tried PilBox:
>
> I have a customer with Samsung Xcover 4 devices, and they get an IOException
> 'Cannot run program "bin/picolisp" ... No such file'.
did you try the absolute path?
Richard
--
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 09:03:47AM +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
> On Sun 22 Nov 2020 at 01:32, Alexander Williams wrote:
> > Not a lawyer here, but PicoLisp 21 does **not** need to be GPL'd.
>
> it does not because it is already compatible with GPL
>
> > Everyone seems to confuse "linking to a
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 09:22:29AM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Yes, I want pil21 as a piece be completely "free", in the spirit of MIT.
corporations tend to abuse the idealist "spirit of free" often. I prefer
something in the middle of GPL and MIT which LGPL does in many cases.
The
Good bye Richard Z :-(
You are now unsubscribed
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
24 matches
Mail list logo
