Very good point, Michael!
In fact, unless we find a generous donator, we can be sure that a lot of the
paper printed material that will be circulated or posted will be black and
white! Of course, we can all use our inkjet printer to print the color Logo on
nice paper and then make copies of the
There was a question about the value of having a ground glass on a PH/ZP
camera
I found this information on the Photo Technical Group site. There are PDF's
for the camera and an exposure calculator.
Ground Glass Back: Due to the small size of the pinhole and zone plate
apertures,
using the
--- Simon Cygielski si...@wbj.pl wrote:
I just voted in the survey, but I want to take the opportunity to lobby
for the design with the pinhole photographer on top of the world. That
really makes a statement, doesn't it?
Yeah, that's he's got a pinhole for a belly button. g
Sorry, just
I just voted in the survey, but I want to take the opportunity to lobby
for the design with the pinhole photographer on top of the world. That
really makes a statement, doesn't it?
Seriously, though, it's my favorite because it says world AND pinhole
photography without looking corporate. I love
At this time I want to annouce to the Disscussion Group that we now have a
poll for you to Vote on which logo you would like to see for the WPPD. A
couple things you might want to consider before you vote. The logo will be
used with and with out the text that goes along with it. Not all the logos
Do we need someone for Dutch translation?
If so, I'll ask my son. He lived in Amsterdam for quite a long time.
Best to all,
leezy
Hello Dieter,
Thanks for working on the German translation of PR.
you wrote :
I am working on the German version already. Are we going to have the
translations on the web site, too, or are they just for distribution?
If so, to whom shall I mail it?
The translations will be used in 2
Hi all,
I wanted to update everyone on where things are regarding the 1st worldewide
pinhole photography day (WPPD).
1) The official press release has been finalized. A lot of work has gone into
crafting this statement. It was drafted by several people on the organizing
team working
on 3/12/01 6:45 AM, Guy Glorieux at guy.glori...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Colin, just a word to say that your input was
tremendously appreciated!
I whole heartily agree.
James
Simon Cygielski wrote:
This may be too late, as I didn't have a chance to read my mail since
Thursday, but I think that Colin's edit of the press release reads
better than the one posted on pinholeday.org.
Simon
Hi Simon!
Thanks for your comment.
The Press Release, like any other document
This may be too late, as I didn't have a chance to read my mail since
Thursday, but I think that Colin's edit of the press release reads
better than the one posted on pinholeday.org.
Simon
I think this is evidenced in scanning using CCD's, too. As nearly as I
can tell, CMOS somehow avoids this problem.
Pam
echinis...@gmx.de wrote:
Why do you suppose that is?
Pam
Michael Keller wrote:
...With digital, long exposures can lead to increased
noise in the shadows.
I've read a number of papers explaining the physics of a Zone Plate.
However, I haven't seen anything that deals with the number of Zones that
comprise the Zone Plate.
Is there an optimum number of zones? Does it change with the focal length?
What is the effect on resolution depth of field?
Why do you suppose that is?
Pam
Michael Keller wrote:
I've used a zone plate on a Nikon D1. Not real thrilled with my results,
but
I think it's just me. With digital, long exposures can lead to increased
noise in the shadows.
The CCD chips tend to give a signal not only when
It says extreme depth of field... and I would think that f/256 with a 2
focal length would be pretty extreme depth of field. I remember seeing this
camera once before... maybe somebody posted it to the list? I'm curious if
anybody has one. It seems like a lot of money for something that can be
15 matches
Mail list logo