F-stop questionCalculate the area of your aperture (pi x radius squared).
Calculate the area of an f22 aperture at 50mm (50mm divided by 22 =diameter.
Area =(1/2diameter)(1/2diameter) x pi. Divide the area of your aperture into
the area of f22. The result equals 40. Multiply f22 metered exposure
://idea.uwosh.edu/nick/pinholephoto.htm and finding the
link there. Then right click on it, and click on save target as. That
will save it to your hard drive, and you should be able to open it with
acrobat reader from there.
John
- Original Message -
From: Bill Erickson erick...@hickorytech.net
I can't get the document to open.
- Original Message -
From: Nick Dvoracek dvora...@vaxa.cis.uwosh.edu
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:45 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] D'Arcy Power article on-line
A while ago there was a thread about an
Try the Black Cat thing. I can't remember the rest of the name. You can find
it under Black cat at pinhole resource and other camera places. It's not a
meter but it will translate from f22 to the higher Fstops. It's a $20
carboard dial with a long list of exposure by condition suggestions too.
Covering Power of PinholesSimple answer is that covering power generally is 1
1/2 times the focal length either side of the axis. Erics book has both complex
and simple formulae. The simple formula is the diameter of the aperture in
thosandths of an inch (for example 0.010= 10) divided by 55
Any power tool will shred the cardboard. I'd use either an xacto knife or a
single edger razor blade.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Harris cpharrisph...@hotmail.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:58 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Cutting oatmeal box
I'm about to leave for two weeks of pinholing in Italy. I feel rather self
conscious about digging in a changing bag and putting out suspicious looking
cannisters on the Ponte Veccio. Can some one tell me how to say It's just
an home made camera, or I am harmless, though eccentric in Italian?
If the essence of a child is movement, then a pinhole is the ideal method to
desribe it. My experience is that you can captue quiet movement easily
enough in bright sun. Anything moving throughout an exposure of more than
ten seconds will simply disappear. I enjoy playing with overnight exposures,
I find that if you leave the dark slide in, it tends to wobble or catch the
breeze and move the camera. I pull it out and then throw my jacket or a
black plastic bag over the back of the camera. that's what dark cloths are
for in large format lens photography.
- Original Message -
From:
A 0.44 mm aperture placed 145mm from the film will cover about 500 mm. The
formulas is that the coverage equals about 1 1/2 times the focal length
either side of center. Focal length is just the distance from the pinhole to
the film. It's really a misnomer because nothing focusses, it's just the
I've seen a number of wooden ones on Ebay.
- Original Message -
From: Greg Newberry grnewbe...@qwest.net
To: Pinhole-Discussion pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 8:10 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Source for 8x10 film holders
Hi, I want to buy a few used
This seems like an opportune time for a variation on the scaner topic. I
have negative scanners but my flatbed scanner is older and not too adequate.
Any advice on choice of flatbed scanner for prints, not negs?
Are these good scanners for opaque material or are they just attractive
because they offer the opportunity to scan negatives?
- Original Message -
From: dalf...@aol.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Epson
Well, actually, the angle of view depends on there being a flat film plane
interposed on the hemispheric optimal image distance. The average 'angle of
view' is 1.5FL either side of the axis. Light falloff is a function of the
different distance from the pinhole at different points on the flat film
There are at least two different formulas for the pinhole to film plane
distance question. There are lots of different tables already calculated
that have been referred to before. See Eric Renner's book for a long
detailed description. Also, since you can be off from the right distance
by a factor
Don't know about the photo-flo, but I have dried film in all sorts of
configurations. One time I left a roll of film hanging for ayear to see how
much dust it accumulated (surprisingly little, probaby because it was
vertical and in a protected corner with no airflow.). If the film is in an
area
The first rule of pinhole is Play!. Try what you said and see if you like
it. My impression is that a lot of the pinholers here use converted lens
cameras or the Zero series. Next favorite is the curved film plane ones,
with the oatmeal carton being the prototype. Figuring out what you yourself
Very nice. I have played around with double exposures, pinhole and
otherwise. I find that including sky in the first exposure tends to
eliminate the second exposure appearing there.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Interrante m...@interwalk.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent:
Glorieux
- Original Message -
From: Bill Erickson erick...@hickorytech.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Hand made darkslides
I've tried it, can't say with much success. I was making a film holder
I've tried it, can't say with much success. I was making a film holder for a
daguerreotype plate by laminating succesive layers of model airplane plywood,
using one of the thinner pieces for the dark slide. it worked OK for the dag
because the plate is so slow', but for film or photographic
That's some sort of diffraction pattern, I assume from internal reflections.
if you figure it out let me know. i made one camera that did the same thing
and i could never isolate the source.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Donnelly danieldonne...@yahoo.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at
Very nice. I like the kalotype best. I think it's neat to have the whole
process be handmade.
- Original Message -
From: Ingo Guenther ingoguent...@web.de
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 6:02 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] New Pictures uploaded!
Hi
Thanks for the response. I was looking at the picture and realizing that one
could sense the space by feel, heat, noise and the warmth from sunlight.
- Original Message -
From: pete eckert peteeck...@mindspring.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:54 PM
As ithink about your image, i have a question which I think pertains to our
art and is not just ersonal poking around. I have had experience with
hearing impaired people, and I have the impression that those who have been
deaf since birth and do not experience sound except as a sense of vibration
Amazing!
- Original Message -
From: Steve Wilson steve.wil...@eyeconcur.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Cc: peteeck...@mindspring.com
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] New image saloon uploaded on behalf of Pete
Eckert
A new image, Saloon, has
All suggestions will work, but just letting it dry and then re-wetting it
when you want to clear it worked OK for me.
- Original Message -
From: dalf...@aol.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55
If you use lith developer, you will get only blacks and whites. If you use
dektol1:2 you will get some shades of grey. It's easy to try other film or
paper developers since you can develop by inspection, just deelop until it
stops changing. I think you'll get more pleasing results using Dektol.
Try 5 or 10. Instead of under or over exposure what you get is more or less
black areas. it's alsmost a matter of personal taste.
- Original Message -
From: ra...@rahji.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Cc: ra...@rahji.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:44 PM
Subject:
My memory of my work with type 55 is that the reciprocity corrections used
for other film worked fine with type 55. I exposed for negative, not
positive, ASA 25.
- Original Message -
From: Markus Birsfelder b...@freesurf.ch
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Wednesday, February 20,
No. They're bigger and you will need a different, and much more expensive,
slide projector. Sorry.
- Original Message -
From: R Duarte ra...@rahji.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 7:18 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] 120 slide film?
Hi. Stupid
I've seen the prototype and talked to the fellow, but i haven't seen any
pictures. It seems to be well thought out.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Harvey harv...@aracnet.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 8:41 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole
If the focal distance is 1/3 inch, you could expect a visible image cone
of about 1 inch. The rule of thumb is one and a half focal lengths either
side of the axis.
- Original Message -
From: J.E. Patterson pinh...@lightjunkie.org
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Saturday,
You might be getting some flare from shooting toward the sun. this flattens
out contrast. Also maybe some fogging? It is said to be very difficult to
boost contrast with Ilford film. try tmax.
- Original Message -
From: Liav Koren yu257...@yorku.ca
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent:
Since you brought this up, there are two factors influencing the intensity
of light at the film plane, the distance from the pinhole and the angle off
axis. As you move off axis of a flat film plane, the distance from the
pinhole to the film grows, and the apparent shape of the pinhole changes
When you increase the focal length but leave the negative size the same all
you do is decrease the angle of acceptance of the light beam. You sample a
smaller portion of the potential image. I can't see how the size of the
pinhole would make a difference, except that it casts an optimal potential
Great image. I'm reminded of some postings here a while ago of trafic and
people in times square. I don't care much for zone plate still lifes, but it
gives an interesting sort of surrealism to people.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Interrante m...@interwalk.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p
I noticed the lapse also. I think it's happened before on weekends. I
thought maybe I'd done something wrong and was being shunned. Nice to know
it's not so.
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Wildberger Lisboa wildber...@svn.com.br
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Saturday,
The addresses I wrote only take you to the gallery page. the images are in
the 2002 gallery.
Final report. http://www.???/discussion/upload/ifoout
ISO of 1.5 outdoors with 85B filter gives a print maybe just a little
overexposed. http://www.???/discussion/upload/ilfoin
ISO 3 with tungsten indoors, no filter, gives print just a little
underexposed. Indoor color balance is nice.
-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] speed of Ilfochrome classic.
--- Bill Erickson erick...@hickorytech.net wrote:
Here's my first tries. With a pinhole of known diameter at optimal
distance
from the paper, ASA 3 will yield
I'm just beginning to calibrate Ilfochrome classic paper, to determine the
effective ASA at various durations of exposure. I'll post the results when I
get them.
- Original Message -
From: Glenn Friedel gfrie...@basetech.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday, February 01,
I discover that people who get my messages forwarded in the digest format
have been receiving scrambled messages. I've been told that this is because
I had been sending in html instead of plain text, and that the digesting
program presumably can't read MIME (the name of some program regarding
Mouth-pinhole portraiture! What a wonderful way to de-sensitize students to
photographing other people close enough up.
- Original Message -
From: Lisa Reddig l...@julianrichards.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:19 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion]
When the notch is in the upper right corner the emulsion is toward you.
- Original Message -
From: pete eckert peteeck...@mindspring.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:10 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] (no subject)
I made a 8 x 10 camera to take
Re: [pinhole-discussion] uploadIs it fortune favors the brave, chance favors
only the prepared mind or 'even a blind squirrel will occasionally find a nut?
- Original Message -
From: Kosinski Family
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:07 AM
, Bill Erickson at erick...@hickorytech.net wrote:
I uploaded the results of an accident:
www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=achagower.jpg
http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=achagower.jpg The
figures are in a cemetery in the village of Achagower
I uploaded the results of an accident:
www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=achagower.jpg The figures
are in a cemetery in the village of Achagower, in County Mayo, Ireland, but the
tombstones are at Kilgeever Abbey, thirty miles south. I was shooting 8x10 Tmax
400 and mistakenly
In a darkroom that small you should make some effort to assure adequate
ventilation. It's no fun only being able to print until you begin to get sick.
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Johanson
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 2:03 PM
Should be just density.
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Johanson
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 2:03 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Darkroom light
I am planning to make a darkroom out of a rather limited space (floor about 1
by 1,5
I'm reminded that when I visited the Sistine Chapel the man in front of me
in line was blind, white cane and all. He seemed to be as moved as the rest
of us.
- Original Message -
From: Murray mur...@uptowngallery.org
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:21
Science or art? Science ensures that is titanium yellow is always titanium
yellow. Art makes yellow things.
Style or content? As has already been noted, they mate.
What is pinhole all about? About involving the operator more in the process,
about technical minimalism, about points of view
I tried one pack of the sepia and wasted a lot of it because I underestimated
the reciprocitycorrection very badly. It would be a contributiuon for soemone
to come up with good reciprocity recommendations for polaroid sepia.
- Original Message -
From: Louisa M. Kirby
To:
And thank you for making MY day.
- Original Message -
From: cmcbe...@aol.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] 12 day exposure
http://www.p at
They should work for both neg and positive. My guess is you'll need to
experiement to see the effect on the negative. Effect on positive should be
as predicted.
- Original Message -
From: Chris chri...@worldnet.att.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:02
By gosh, he's got it! I think he's got it!
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Louis Thiry multim...@wanadoo.fr
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:40 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Dwarf pictures
As it is the first time I'm posting a message, though I
Seems to me you would also need to protect the pinhole from water, lest you
get a meniscus of water there due to surface tension.
- Original Message -
From: Uptown Gallery gall...@uptowngallery.org
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 11:35 PM
Subject:
very nice! It's fun to see images where the artist clearly visualized in
advance what they wanted to accomplish, and did so.
- Original Message -
From: Christian Harkness chris.harkn...@eudoramail.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 7:32 AM
Subject:
Porters, at www.porters.com has good plastic. Not very elegant, though.
- Original Message -
From: b2myo...@aol.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:51 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] focusing loupe and focusing cloth
In a message dated
the shutter leave
the camera?
cool..
happy new year
andy
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Bill Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 7:36 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p
I forgot to add that the negative was 5x7Ilford iso 400 curved in a semicircle
to conform to the curve of the optimal image. When it's put right up against
the front of the camera it results in nearly a 180 degree angle of view. The
curved lines at the sides are the edges of the filter holder
, December 22, 2001 11:09 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Pinhole-Discussion digest, Vol 1 #564 - 8
msgs
Subject : Ultra closeup photography.
Bill Erickson in replying to Rachel Mallon's questionnaire mentioned ultra
closeup pinhole photography. Please tell me what this means. What subject,
how
You get it all the time when loading 35mm or 120 film, when you pull the
tape off. I've never seen it cause a problem.
- Original Message -
From: R Duarte ra...@rahji.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:56 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] agfa
I did an exposure of a scene for which the metered exposure for the pinhole was
4 hours. I exposed it for five days, an aggregate of about 40 hours of peak
light time, on Ilford HP5 ASA 400, with standard development in HC 110.
There's a usable image but its thin and lacking in detail in the
Absolutely. use a fim speed of 5 or6.
- Original Message -
From: Chris chri...@worldnet.att.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:10 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Will paper work in 4x5 film holder?
I'm building my first 4x5 pin hole. It's an
I doubt you'll have much trouble. Correct paper exposure in the darkroom is
traditionally a matter of trial and error, or at least repeated trials,
anyway. There have been several discussions here about this topic. My
impression is that you get some reciprocity effect beginning at maybe a half
See eric renners description in his book.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Donnelly danieldonne...@yahoo.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:51 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Re: Pinhole-Discussion digest, Vol 1 #557 - 16
msgs
Has anyone any
I'd be proud to share it. Send me your mailing address.
- Original Message -
From: b2myo...@aol.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures
In a message dated 12/8/01 11:38:25 PM,
- Original Message -
From: Bill Erickson
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 7:21 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] A test of long exposures
I uploaded three images which are the result of exposure times arrived at
with less than
The camera is a 2 inch focal length with optimal (purchased and focal
lenghth calculated) pinhole, just a woden box glued to an old 6x7 rollfilm
back. PortraVC 400 film. I find that overnight exposures that go from about
a half hour after sunset to a half hour after sunrise give good shadow
and your post reminded me of my earlier years working at room
temprature, processing a print for 20 minutes, (EP2 was slower). You
might look into other chemicals. I think I saw the Jobo's line of
chemicals could also be used at room temprature.
Bill Erickson wrote:
Ihe arts center where i teach
I had the same experience with polaroid color and dcided it wasn't worth it.
- Original Message -
From: jack duganne duga...@earthlink.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:07 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] strange color with Polaroid color
The more I thought about this the more I realized that, with very long
exposures, the risk of overexposure is lessened by reciprocity failure, and
the longer the exposure, the less the overexposure risk. In essence, it is far
easier to fatally underexpose than fatally overexpose, and far more
I get the message. More is better, but don't forget to go to bed.
- Original Message -
From: Guy Glorieux
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity failure of paper negs.
Bill Erickson
I've used 4x5,5x7,8x10 without problem. for me the issues were how much
could i influence negative contast since I intended to use the negs for
contact alternative process prints. Tmax is much the easiest to influence
contrast via agitation. don't know anything about xray film. Your task, if
you
There was a string of comments and a picture quite a while ago, either here
or in the cameramakers discussion group, about usng a digital camera
intended for Barbie dolls as a pinhole. I don't see any reason not to try
it. If you have access to a back, it shouldn't act any different than a lens
I was the one asking about Ilfochrome. thanks for the information, but I
already have a JOBO. The chemicals shipped with no problem from Calumet.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmitt aschm...@warwick.net
To: pinhole discussion list Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday,
Thanks for the help. I got chemistry from calumet.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmitt aschm...@warwick.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:55 PM
Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Ilfochrome
Dover Photo in Dover NJ has some stocks can get it for
Each succeeding fstop is simply the diameter of the aperture divided into
the distance from pinhole to film. The specific numbers are traditional and
represent a set of diameters that yield aperture areas that are double or
half the adjacent one.
- Original Message -
From: ragowaring
Thanks for the replies re P30. I had looked in the on-line catalogues but not
in the hard copy. Calumet says there's no extra shipping charge as long it is
shipped by ground. Which 85 filter is best? And is the paper ca ISO 6, like
BW? I've made a camera which will yield a close to 180 degree
I want to use ilfochrome paper for direct positive prints. I have experience
with RA-4 processing in a JOBO. I can't seem to find the processing chemicals
for ilfochrome in any sort of volumes practical for 'wet lab' home processing.
It looks like the chemicals are only packaged in larger
Calculate the diameter of each f stop at the original focal length-probably
40 or 50 mm. Diameter equals focal length divided by f stop number. Then
divide aperture diameter into your new lens to film distance to get the new
f stop. You undoubtedly won't get full coverage of your new format with
As with all things pinhole, the rule is try it!' My understanding is that
zone plates of focal length less than 75mm are unreliably small to make.
- Original Message -
From: TSHACK tsh...@silver-bayou.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:36 PM
Subject:
You would just have a very narrow acceptance angle and a very long exposure
time, plus difficulty knowing just what you were pointing at. there are some
pictures of cameras like ths in eric renner's book.
- Original Message -
From: John Ptak jfjp...@yahoo.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at
calculate the optimal diameter for 38 mm distance.
- Original Message -
From: LEGE ARTIS legear...@trak.to
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 11:43 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole size for a Nikon bodycap
Hi there,
Does anybody know which size
here's the right one
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers.
to post a message on the discussion use cameramak...@opusis.com
If anyone is interested, there is a discussion going on currently on the
cameramakers discussion group about making plastic cameras. Lots of advice
about different methods of molding different plastics. This discussion group
began as the society of handmade cameras, which seems mostly defunct.
It'll work.
- Original Message -
From: Murray upt...@uptowngallery.org
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] 35 mm body f.l. determination
I hope I did it right - I took a steel rule as well as a depth caliper and
The term natural camera appears for the first time that I know of in
Petzval's 1857 presentation On the Camera Obscura, where he defines the
natural camera, which uses only a small hole to gather images, as one which
is elementary in character, convenient in form and inexpensive to
produce- -it
You can make duplicate negs and manipulate them, you can find someone or
someplace with a 4x5 enlarger and enlarge them. If you just want to play
with camera-making and contact printing, try making a 5x7 or even an 8x10,
both of which make great contact prints.
- Original Message -
From: R
how refreshing to be back on task.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Kosara rkos...@asgaard.tuwien.ac.at
To: Pinhole Discussion List pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Ann Hamilton, mouth camera.
Hello,
On Sun,
I have made multiple pinhole lens boards, with one pinhole near each edge.
You have to offset the board in order to center the pinhole.
- Original Message -
From: mdelman mdel...@rochester.rr.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 6:06 AM
Subject:
I mentioned recently but it's petinent to this message. Overexposure at long
exposures is lessened by the reciprocity failure. Also keep in mind that in
oder to get even one stop of change at long intervals. You have to double
the metered time for your pinhole size and then double it again to get
I'm pretty sure you can use it to line your paper up, but you can also just
line up the empty easel, if you're using one. If not, just line up a piece
of paper and mark the edges with masking tape and put subsequent pieces of
paper inside the tape lines.
- Original Message -
From: R Duarte
There used to be the sleaziest camel imaginable in the Bismarck zoo. But
that's off-topic.
- Original Message -
From: Marcy Merrill ma...@merrillphoto.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pintoids
Guy
The second upper midwest pinhole gettogether is at pARTS gallery on Lake St,
just west of lyndale, in minneapolis, 2pm sunday november 4..t
- Original Message -
From: tricks...@aol.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: Re:
I think the BTZS brand dark clothes are the sort you want. there are ads
in View camera magazine.
- Original Message -
From: Gordon J. Holtslander hol...@duke.usask.ca
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] 4 x 5
I've had no experience with ilford HP%, and each BW film has it's own
requirement. my general advice is expose longer than you think necessary
and it'll probably be OK. The reciprocity failure you're trying to
compensate for in fact buffers the overexposure error.
- Original Message -
I am 66, bought my first camera in 1958, my first year in medical school.
I've been a devoted pinholer and self conscious follower of Eric Renner
for about 5 years now. I propose two rules for you- the first is try it,
and the second is have fun.
- Original Message -
From:
This is very impressive, and very touching. Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: Guy Glorieux guy.glori...@sympatico.ca
To: Pinhole List pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 4:09 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Solidarity
These images brought together by
I really like your work, maybe because it goes in the same direction, and
you seem to feel the same about it, as me. I was scheduled to go to NYC next
week, and I had plans for exactly the same sort of Times Square shot. Very
nice, very consistent quality work on your website.
- Original
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
