--- jmeyerh...@aol.com wrote:
How do you develop ortho film for continuous tone? Thank you...j
Use dilute Dektol. I use Dektol 1+15, though I may opt for 1+10 through 1+20
depending upon the scene and its final purpose (I might use 1+10 if I am going
to print with the Van Dyke process). Best
How do you develop ortho film for continuous tone? Thank you...j
Hi:
For my pinhole stuff I mostly shoot 8x10, but I use ortho film but develop
it as continuous tone film. My 8x10 film costs me CA$70.00 for 100 sheets
I contact print these images, usually on cyanotype.
This can actually make things very convenient.
I recently returned from a vacation. As an
William Erickson wrote:
The rolls are just in there loose, with a pressure plate that tends to push
them out of position. The lid seems to be engineered so closely that it does
hang up when you try to put it on. Worse than trying to load a Leica. You
need good vision to see the numbers on the
William,
Thanks for the feedback -- can you tell me why the 6x9 multi format Zero was
so hard to load? I've heard there can be some difficulty in getting the lid
on over the film rolls. The results I've seen from this camera have been
very nice, although 5x4 beckons!
R.J.
R.J. Fox
Member
) pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:20 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Newbie Intro. and a few questions
Short introduction: I'm an amateur photographer in the Washington DC area
shooting mostly medium format on-location portraits and architectural
stuff.
I shoot
of seeing the
world!
R.J.
-Original Message-
From: George L Smyth [mailto:glsm...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:43 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Newbie Intro. and a few questions
--- Fox, Robert r...@aarp.org wrote:
[clip
- Original Message -
From: Fox, Robert r...@aarp.org
Are there any practical reasons to shoot at 4x5 rather than 8x10?
4x5 is more, well, practical: smaller, less costly to operate, easier to carry
and you don't have to get a second mortage to buy an enlarger (if you wanted
larger than
--- Fox, Robert r...@aarp.org wrote:
[clip]
Are there any practical reasons to shoot at 4x5 rather than 8x10? I suppose
it would be easy enough to do both, but I'm wondering about people's
preferences for architectural and portrait work. The multi-format Zero2000
looks like a good starter as
