To: INTERNET:pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject:Re: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
My experience with pinhole color polaroid is that you get terrible ugly
green color shifts.
My experience with pinhole color polaroid is that you get terrible ugly
green color shifts.
- Original Message -
From: mdelman mdel...@rochester.rr.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
Derek
, September 02, 2001 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
Andy Schmitt wrote:
The 545 back is only for Polaroid sheet film..It does allow you to
use
Polaroid where previously only sheet film holders could go. I've heard
some
people trying to use ready-loads
Andy Schmitt wrote:
The 545 back is only for Polaroid sheet film..It does allow you to use
Polaroid where previously only sheet film holders could go. I've heard some
people trying to use ready-loads in them but without much success...
The instruction sheet that comes with Fuji
just what I was looking for. Thanks so much!
-Original Message-
From: Derek Watkins [mailto:100015@compuserve.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:59 AM
To: 'INTERNET:pinhole-discussion@p at ???'
Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
Laura
Excuse me
this helps.
Regards
Derek Watkins
--
From: INTERNET:pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: 27 August 2001 22:13
To: 'pinhole-discussion@p at ???'
Subject:RE: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
Bill, When you rate Type 55 at ISO 25, is there a need to calculate
/~qtluong/photography/lf/holders.html
Hope it can help !
Happy pinholing, from France
Jean
- Original Message -
From: lva l...@pamho.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
I have two packs of TriX Film Packs that will fit your back if you want them.
They went out of date in Sept. 1969.
Mike Vande Bunt wrote:
Just a warning for any of you who may be looking for a
Graphic Polaroid pack film adapter (I got one as part of
an oscilloscope camera): Do not
Kodak have discontinued the double sided sheet readyload film, but are
now producing a sigle film envelope to go in a new holder - not
released yet. However they say it will fit the 545 back without a
problem. Tests reported on the web are very encouraging. Cost (in UK)
is @ £20 a box of 20
Reportedly (www.graflex.org) the 545 back CAN be used
with Fiji Quickloads and the Kodak equivalent that I can't
seem to remember the name of. (Though the correct holders
for those film loads are cheaer than a 545 if you have no
interest in using Polaroid materials...)
Mike Vande Bunt
Sally
Don't use the 3000 speed bw film unless you have an
actual shutter; the exposures are usually in the fraction
of a second range. WITH a shutter it is a great film to use
becaue you can hand hold the camera. (I have used it in
a Speed Graphic with pinhole.)
Mike Vande Bunt
Ann King wrote:
More thread hijacking...
Years ago I did some fiddling with single sheet 4x5 polaroid. I was
trying to make a do-it-yourself polaroid back on a pinhole camera. I
never got it working - but didn't persist.
I did discover that one can take a polaroid sheet, expose it in the
standard single sheet
, 2001 3:58 PM
Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
Bill, When you rate Type 55 at ISO 25, is there a need to calculate for
reciprocity failure. If so, how do you do so? I've been using Type 55 with my
Leonardo with some good results but I've just been guessing
Message -
From: Bill Erickson mailto:erick...@hickorytech.net
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? mailto:pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
The fact that you use readyloads in a polaoid back is entirely
I don't mean to hijack the thread but, talking about Polaroid, there are at
eBay quite a few number of Graphic Polaroid adapters that take Polaroid pack
film, I believe this is the less expensive 600 type of film (665 for
instance is the positive+negative film). They don't go for a lot of money
--- Colin Talcroft ctalcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I was surprised to see someone here say
that people say they have trouble with them. The only
difficult thing is that removing them from the holder
is sometimes difficult, but I find the Polaroid films
difficult to remove too (removing them
Kodak have discontinued the double sided sheet readyload film, but are now
producing a sigle film envelope to go in a new holder - not released yet.
However they say it will fit the 545 back without a problem. Tests reported on
the web are very encouraging. Cost (in UK) is @ £20 a box of 20
the regular holder,
but that's a minor point.
- Original Message -
From: Ann King
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 9:11 AM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
Can anyone give me advice on using sheet film in a polaroid 545 back
, 2001 2:22 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Polaroid 545 back
I use the Polaroid 545 back with the Kodak Ready Loads
all the time with great success. They are very easy to
use. I don't know what range of films is available in
the Ready Load format, but I use
I use the Polaroid 545 back with the Kodak Ready Loads
all the time with great success. They are very easy to
use. I don't know what range of films is available in
the Ready Load format, but I use the T-Max 100
version. They come in boxes of ten with two sheets in
each. You expose one side, remove
Terry,
Are you wanting to use polaroid film in the 545 back or are you
thinking of somehow using it as a holder for regular sheet film?
That would be very interesting to me also if it's possible.
Sally Bowker
Can anyone give me advice on using sheet film in a polaroid 545 back
on a
Can anyone give me advice on using sheet film in a polaroid 545 back on a
pinhole camera? Results with different films etc. Thanks, Terry
22 matches
Mail list logo
