Hi Derek,
I used to use Fuji NPL but not for pinhole.
If I remember well, the S stands for short exposures, like using flash lights
or under daylight (not that daylight necessarily means short, specially to us)
, and the L stands for long exposures, when working with tungsten
illumination. The
that's not much time for a time capsule is it? i think a long term one is a
really cool idea though. is this still related to the thread about whether
bw developer will be around in 50 years? ie: would we be making cameras,
taking a picture, then putting the camera in the time capsule? or
We could do both.
leezy
maybe we could have a time capsule as part of WPPD and then have a
celebration in 2011 and open the capsule as part of our festivities
jim
Thanks Derek!
Have you come up with your own reciprocity adjustments,
or are you using what the manufacturer suggests?
-Jeff
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Derek Watkins wrote:
Jeff
I've been shooting Fuji NPS with great success. Although the maximum
recommended exposure is 5 seconds, I've used it
Jeff
I've been shooting Fuji NPS with great success. Although the maximum
recommended exposure is 5 seconds, I've used it at 1 and 2 minutes with no
problems at all. And I made one early morning shot in October a couple of
years ago where the final exposure worked out at 16 minutes! Colour
I've shot color slide film (Sensia II and kodak E200) in my 35mm camera with
a pinhole. I don't have any problem getting good exposures. Although, I've
only done this in good light where the exposures were under 10 seconds.
Sensia II requires no exposure compensation for reciprocity if the
In a message dated 8/3/01 6:22:18 AM, zin...@telenet.net writes:
Brilliant idea Guillermo, why don't we all make a time capsule as the next
discussion group project? It should be a lot easier than WPPD, which turned
out so well!
Jim
We could do both.
leezy
Brilliant idea Guillermo, why don't we all make a time capsule as the next
discussion group project? It should be a lot easier than WPPD, which turned
out so well!
Jim
On the other hand, I recently exposed several rolls of portra, using
reciprocity correction that would have badly over-exposed it if the claim of
no recirocity failure was true. they all came through well exposed but not
badly overexposed.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Miller
i use a brownie six - 16 as a pinhole camera and it takes great pictures.
they're easy to disassemble / reassemble and yeild an unusually wide image on
120 film. the shutter mechanism will let you do timed exposures (it stays open
by itself). the only problem is spooling the film, as they no
As I recall, you can actually use coffee as a developer!
Mike Vande Bunt
Edward Meyers wrote:
Although the packaged chemicals might not be around, the individual
chemicals will be. Just mix your ownif you're here 50 years from now.
Ed
I finally got literature from Fujifilm, and it was only the
Professional product line.
They had a 4 x 5 film pack that has some weird (to me) extraction and
reinsertion capability so it can be transported out of a camera to
processing...it sounded interesting.
I took three photos indoors with
- Original Message -
From: HypoBob hypo...@pacbell.net
You have the kind of wonderfully twisted mind that is an asset in pinhole
photograhpy. However, I think Skip has a point -- there may not be any BW
processing chemicals around in 50 to 100 years, so
you had better leave a
Although the packaged chemicals might not be around, the individual
chemicals will be. Just mix your ownif you're here 50 years from now.
Ed
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, HypoBob wrote:
Guillermo,
You have the kind of wonderfully twisted mind that is an asset in pinhole
photograhpy. However,
In 1953 I made a pinhole exposure with one of the Kodak cardboard
kit pinhole cameras, of my father standing at the base
of the American Niagra Falls. I believe it was a 10 second
exposure on 3 1/4x 4 1/4 Kodak Super Panchro Press Type B
film. I kept the camera, with that film, in a dark place
15 matches
Mail list logo
