Hi,
The patch does not regress the mingw-based build (basically that used in
http://cairographics.org/end_to_end_build_for_win32/ )
I did not manage to get the build working on the cmd.exe shell. Do you have
any instructions (or possibly indications about what is the correct
environment)
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:47:47 +0100
Ben Avison bavi...@riscosopen.org wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:51:25 +0100, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com
wrote:
If we fixed gettime() for clock() wraparounds rather than ignoring them,
I suppose there would be no reason to have gettimei().
Ben?
The patch does not regress the mingw-based build (basically that used in
http://cairographics.org/end_to_end_build_for_win32/ )
I did not manage to get the build working on the cmd.exe shell. Do you have
any instructions (or possibly indications about what is the correct
environment) for that?
On Tue, 26 May 2015 23:58:30 +0100
Ben Avison bavi...@riscosopen.org wrote:
This test aims to verify both numerical correctness and the honouring of
array bounds for scaled plots (both nearest-neighbour and bilinear) at or
close to the boundary conditions for applicability of cover type fast
