Re: [Pixman] [PATCH] Add CMake build rules

2016-05-22 Thread Emil Velikov
On 22 May 2016 at 10:47, whitequark wrote: > On 2016-05-22 09:20, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >> Assuming people were happy adding a new build system, which I very >> much doubt, > > > I've checked the mailing list of Cairo before starting this work. > There

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH] Add CMake build rules

2016-05-22 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 22-05-16 om 11:47 schreef whitequark: > On 2016-05-22 09:20, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >> [snip] >> >> For what benefit? So that people who set up cross-build toolchains and >> projects as their job have one less component to make that setup for? > > So that people would avoid the setup of

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH] Add CMake build rules

2016-05-22 Thread whitequark
On 2016-05-22 09:20, Pekka Paalanen wrote: [snip] Assuming people were happy adding a new build system, which I very much doubt, I've checked the mailing list of Cairo before starting this work. There have been two attempts at introducing a CMake buildsystem, and no conceptual objections were

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH] Add CMake build rules

2016-05-22 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Sun, 22 May 2016 01:54:36 + whitequark wrote: > CMake is a popular build system for C/C++ projects. One key property > it has is that a library using CMake can be "drop in" vendored, > that is, placed in the build tree of another project using CMake > and