On 22 May 2016 at 10:47, whitequark wrote:
> On 2016-05-22 09:20, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Assuming people were happy adding a new build system, which I very
>> much doubt,
>
>
> I've checked the mailing list of Cairo before starting this work.
> There
Op 22-05-16 om 11:47 schreef whitequark:
> On 2016-05-22 09:20, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> For what benefit? So that people who set up cross-build toolchains and
>> projects as their job have one less component to make that setup for?
>
> So that people would avoid the setup of
On 2016-05-22 09:20, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
[snip]
Assuming people were happy adding a new build system, which I very
much doubt,
I've checked the mailing list of Cairo before starting this work.
There have been two attempts at introducing a CMake buildsystem, and
no conceptual objections were
On Sun, 22 May 2016 01:54:36 +
whitequark wrote:
> CMake is a popular build system for C/C++ projects. One key property
> it has is that a library using CMake can be "drop in" vendored,
> that is, placed in the build tree of another project using CMake
> and