On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
> wrote:
> > Running "lowlevel-blt-bench over_n_" on Playstation3 3.2GHz,
> > Gentoo ppc (32-bit userland) gave the following results:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:31:42 +0100
"Ben Avison" wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:37:41 +0100, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
> > I think we need some indication whether cover-test runs with or without
> > fencing. So far I have thought that if
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:55:56 +0300
Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Pekka Paalanen
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 18:27:07 +0300
> > > Oded
On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:09:04 +0100
"Ben Avison" wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:42:26 +0100, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:39:07 +0300
> > Oded Gabbay wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Ben
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:27:18 +0300
Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
> > wrote:
> > > Running "lowlevel-blt-bench
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Ben Avison wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:46:50 +0100, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
>
>> you're right, documenting this is important. However, I think this
>> particular patch is not the best place, and here is why.
>>
>>