[Pixman] [PATCH] Make mmx code compatible with Solaris Studio 12.3 compilers

Rearranged some of the existing gcc Intel compiler checks to allow easier sharing of common cases among the compilers. Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com --- pixman/pixman-mmx.c | 57 ++- 1 files changed, 38 insertions

[Pixman] [PATCH] Just use xmmintrin.h when building with Solaris Studio compilers

Since the Solaris Studio compilers don't have a mode where MMX instructions are available and SSE instructions are not, we can just use the xmmintrin.h header directly. Fixes build failure due to Studio not supporting the __gnu_inline__ or __artificial__ attributes. Signed-off-by: Alan

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 1/8] Add doubly linked lists

own? Presumably GCC's __builtin_offsetof is designed to mimic the standard C offsetof. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ Pixman mailing list

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 00/10] Cleanups to CPU detection

be present - is that not the case? -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc ___ Pixman mailing list Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 00/10] Cleanups to CPU detection

On 06/29/12 02:36 PM, sandm...@cs.au.dk wrote: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes: On 06/29/12 01:44 PM, Søren Sandmann Pedersen wrote: I was looking at making use of some of the newer x86 SIMD instruction sets and realized that (a) we don't ever call cpuid on x86-64, we

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 08/10] Cleanups and simplifications in x86 CPU feature detection

; } + Don't you need to update the feature flags set in the getisax code to match the renaming you did to cpu_features_t ? -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH] Resolve implementation-defined behaviour for division rounded to -infinity

On 08/26/15 06:21 AM, Ben Avison wrote: No, but I'd have thought it was bad practice to assume C99 behaviour when compiling C89. Perhaps the AC_PROG_CC_C99 macro should be added to the pixman/configure.ac to avoid that then. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm

[Pixman] CVE-2014-9766 assigned for integer overflow in pixman < 0.32.6

://cgit.freedesktop.org/pixman/commit/?id=50d7b5fa8ea2ae119f35c20ab0dd0413d5103cbb It is included in pixman 0.32.6 and later releases. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com X.Org Security Response Team - xorg-secur...@lists.x.org --- Begin Message --- Hi

Re: [Pixman] 'AV_386_SSSE3' undeclared when building pixman0.34.1 with Solaris10-u2

(Solaris 10 8/08). Can you not update to an OS that's only 8 years old instead of sticking to the 10 year old release? -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc

Re: [Pixman] 'AV_386_SSSE3' undeclared when building pixman0.34.1 with Solaris10-u2

if we have to stick to 10-u2 (CC flag?) I've not tried it, but I can't see any reason why "cc -DAV_386_SSSE3=0x40" wouldn't work for that particular bit of code. If you need to actually call other functions added in that support, you'd probably need something more though. --

Re: [Pixman] anongit.freedesktop.org

the repos moved somewhere else?  Thanks, You should be able to use the URL's shown under the "clone" button on https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pixman/pixman https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/cairo/cairo -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Orac

Re: [Pixman] anongit.freedesktop.org

On 7/13/20 8:25 AM, John Emmas wrote: On 13/07/2020 15:57, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Which URL did you try?  g...@gitlab.freedesktop.org:cairo/cairo.git or https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/cairo/cairo.git ? I tried the one you gave me:- https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/cairo/cairo - but I've