Hi,
Can I get any input if my second patch follows "the right approach"? Are
there any astylerc or clang_format to check that my code complies with
code style ?
Thanks
On 04/19/2018 08:41 PM, Marc Jeanmougin wrote:
Hi,
Could anyone help me from here? If there is still a f
Marc
From 2cd0d0a12c9a68bdedde10ae4b10c335f8961501 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Jeanmougin <m...@jeanmougin.fr>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 22:25:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Adds a gradient dithering function to pixman.
This dithering is random, resulting is no artifacts and very smooth result,
and uses
/2018 10:46 PM, Marc Jeanmougin wrote:
> Hi, I'm back :)
>
>
> I tried to implement the proposed changes :
>
> * the gradient walker now deals with argb_t (floats) and not uint32_t
> * all gradients are WIDE because of the above change
> * WIDE formats (using argb_t) can b
Hi,
Le 27/03/2018 à 02:04, Søren Sandmann a écrit :
> A long time ago I wrote this:
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2012-July/002175.html
>
> about how dithering could be added to pixman. The basic idea is that
> "dithering" is a property of the destination image, not of the
negligible ("good
except for the small stripes" dithering may in fact be slower)
--
Marc
From 85aa2a84e74f3079796ec4686c4fa2acf6c2e93f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Jeanmougin <m...@jeanmougin.fr>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 21:36:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Adds PIXMAN_D
5;
+return x;
+}
diff --git a/pixman/pixman.h b/pixman/pixman.h
index 509ba5e..12612e8 100644
--- a/pixman/pixman.h
+++ b/pixman/pixman.h
@@ -316,6 +316,13 @@ typedef enum
PIXMAN_FILTER_SEPARABLE_CONVOLUTION
} pixman_filter_t;
+typedef enum
+{
+PIXMAN_DITHERING_NONE,
+PIXMAN_DITHERING_GOOD,
+ PIXMAN_DITHERIN
