Brutal fight's video

2009-05-01 Thread Deon Loston
Your love will never be routine with such advantages http://www.jkyfeso.com ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Spice up Your Sex Life for Couples - How To Get Over SOS 'Same Old Sex' Syndrome for Good!

2009-05-01 Thread Bissen
<>___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#526553: jclassinfo: FTBFS: libtool error

2009-05-01 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: jclassinfo Version: 0.19.1-2 Severity: serious >From my pbuilder build log: ... Making all in jclass make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jclassinfo-0.19.1/jclass' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -g -O2 -Wall -MT attribu

CIA tracks phones

2009-05-01 Thread Christene Fauci
These are the pilules for men, who want love making to bring more satisfaction http://www.dyjweg.com ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

libitext-java_2.1.5-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-05-01 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libitext-java-gcj_2.1.5-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/libi/libitext-java/libitext-java-gcj_2.1.5-1_amd64.deb libitext-java_2.1.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libi/libitext-java/libitext-java_2.1.5-1.diff.gz libitext-java_2.1.5-1.dsc to pool/main/libi/libitext-java/libitext-java_2.1.5-1.dsc li

Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?

2009-05-01 Thread Sandro Tosi
I completely agree with Ana, this package needs new fresh blood to maintain it. I repromised myself (some time ago) to give it some love, but I didn't managed to have time to. IMO this should be orphaned, and let another team aggregate to maintain it. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus

Attn:Email Account Owner

2009-05-01 Thread maria cullen
Accu-Online!!! Ticket no. 4 16 19 25 27 40, Batch no;SPYU6868, Do Contact; Mr.Mark Mejia for Clarification and Claim of 800,000.00 Euro you won in Accu-Online. Accu-Online Claims Office Contact:Dr.Mark Mejia Tel:+34-685-279-789 E-Mail:accuclaimonl...@sify.com Regards, Ms.Maria Alan

Please restore your account !

2009-05-01 Thread EasyWeb
___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

batik 1.7-4 MIGRATED to testing

2009-05-01 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the batik source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.7-2 Current version: 1.7-4 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later

Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?

2009-05-01 Thread Ana Guerrero
Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.2-6.1 Severity: important After being hit by #507536 (merged with #511713, #515747) and read http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507536#104 I have been looking at the status of eclipse in Debian. Eclipse's packaging is under the umbrella of the "Debian J

Bug#526472: groovy: Groovy scripts fail to download dependencies with Grape

2009-05-01 Thread Ludovic Claude
Package: groovy Version: 1.6.0-1 Severity: important A Groovy script with Grape annotations (@Grab) will not download its dependencies when using the Debian version of Groovy 1.6. This works well on a vanilla Groovy installation. @Grab(group='org.apache.camel', module='camel-groovy', version='1

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote: > > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: >> > >> > Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable >> > for eclipse afaict. >> > The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: > > > > Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable > > for eclipse afaict. > > The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license. > > Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecat

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: > > > > Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable > > for eclipse afaict. > > The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license. > > Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be depreca