Am Mittwoch, den 27.02.2013, 18:47 +0100 schrieb Roland Stigge:
As you can see above, -mtune=G4 is used by default, leading to the above
illegal instructions. The attached patch fixes this by enabling altivec only
on
powerpc _except_ powerpcspe, and doing confflags += --with-tuning=8548 which
Hi,
On 03/01/2013 03:43 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 27.02.2013, 18:47 +0100 schrieb Roland Stigge:
As you can see above, -mtune=G4 is used by default, leading to the above
illegal instructions. The attached patch fixes this by enabling altivec only
on
powerpc _except_
Your message dated Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:30:24 -0500
with message-id
CAEcnbVzTjjvCdSsDuw5QwEkFR=ijavr3mo-iievq94dv4he...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Closing unreproducible/moreinfo.
has caused the Debian Bug report #664998,
regarding Too much CPU used
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
On 03/01/2013 06:08 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
DEB_HOST_ARCH
DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU
on powerpc and powerpcspe?
On powerpcspe, we have the following settings:
DEB_HOST_ARCH=powerpc
DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU=powerpcspe
Isn't it the other way around?
Of course, sorry!
The two
It looks like the crystalhd drivers are buggy with newer kernel
releases. I opt for removing the dkms package. I will do this over the
weekend.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:52 PM, thomas schorpp
thomas.scho...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28.02.2013 20:41, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at
Am Freitag, den 01.03.2013, 16:05 +0100 schrieb Roland Stigge:
Hi,
On 03/01/2013 03:43 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 27.02.2013, 18:47 +0100 schrieb Roland Stigge:
As you can see above, -mtune=G4 is used by default, leading to the above
illegal instructions. The attached
Hi Adam,
I just stumbled upon XBMC and noticed it would be a valuable replacement for
my current VDR setup and figured I'd probably need tvheadend if I want to keep
watching the DVB-T channels I currently enjoy.
And as I'm a Debian developer, needing to install non-Debian software
irritates
On 01.03.2013 18:36, Andres Mejia wrote:
It looks like the crystalhd drivers are buggy with newer kernel
releases. I opt for removing the dkms package. I will do this over the
weekend.
Top posting on list and removal announce without valid bug report for Your
claimed issue and any
Package: libdiscid0
Version: 0.2.2-3
Package could not be downloaded by apt-get because of different size.
After installing by hand from the web 'apt-get dist-upgrade' fails to
upgrade it every time.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
Processing control commands:
tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #702025 [libdiscid0] (no subject)
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
--
702025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702025
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
On 2013-03-01 21:09:07, TrialAndError wrote:
Package could not be downloaded by apt-get because of different size.
After installing by hand from the web 'apt-get dist-upgrade' fails
to upgrade it every time.
Looks like mirror problems to me. What are
On 01.03.2013 18:36, Andres Mejia wrote:
It looks like the crystalhd drivers are buggy with newer kernel
releases. I opt for removing the dkms package. I will do this over the
weekend.
Driver is maintainable and supported up to at least Linux 3.8 series, when
we'll have 4.0 in debian stable,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 21:38:54 +0100, thomas schorpp wrote:
So no technical reasons to drop the package?
Until and unless the driver is in mainline, there's every reason to drop
it.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:36:03 -0500, Andres Mejia wrote:
It looks like the crystalhd drivers are buggy with newer kernel
releases. I opt for removing the dkms package. I will do this over the
weekend.
Thanks.
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 01.03.2013 21:55, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 21:38:54 +0100, thomas schorpp wrote:
So no technical reasons to drop the package?
Until and unless the driver is in mainline, there's every reason to drop
it.
Well, then drop all the other non-mainline drivers dkms
In short, no. I'm not interested in managing official packages in
distro's etc... It's enough work just helping to maintain the code.
Longer answer...
We provide the launchpad PPA simply because it keeps most of our
users happy and is the best way to get most users running up to date
code. We
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 21:38:54 +0100, thomas schorpp wrote:
So no technical reasons to drop the package?
Until and unless the driver is in mainline, there's every reason to drop
it.
Cheers,
Julien
I just checked
17 matches
Mail list logo
