Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

Hi, 2018-02-26 10:36 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > > > having said that, i'm all for abandoning the > > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.d.o list in favour of > > debian-multimedia@l.d.o > If we agree on this, I can mass-change this in Git. Already have nice script for

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

Hi, On 26/02/18 08:50, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:22:35AM +, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> I just got an email as one of the "list owners" of >> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org - the basic question is >> whether we want to continue using the list (on

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12:08AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > On 02/26/2018 09:50 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > yes, please confirm them that they should leave it behind. > > > just so i understand it (being a non-native, i sometimes screw up with > phrases to mean the exact

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

On 02/26/2018 09:50 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:22:35AM +, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> I just got an email as one of the "list owners" of >> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org - the basic question is >> whether we want to continue using the list (on

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:22:35AM +, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > I just got an email as one of the "list owners" of > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org - the basic question is > whether we want to continue using the list (on the new migration host) or > whether we abandon it in

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:53 AM James Cowgill wrote: > > > listmasters mentioned multiple times that they don't want something on > > l.d.o to appear in the Maintainers field. > > I don't think they said that. They said that they don't want lots of > mailing lists on

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

On 01/28/2018 06:17 PM, James Cowgill wrote: >>> # Incorrect Package Naming >>> My script requires repo name = source package name at the moment so >>> these will be omitted. The pd-* repositories are special because they >>> need to be put in a separate group. Should they intentionally not have

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

Hi James, Thanks for doing this. multimedia-blends could do with a refresh, and it is a bit of a special case as the blends task (web) pages (https://blends.debian.org/multimedia/tasks/index) are generated from it. Lots would probably break if it was renamed. I will take care of it manually

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

Hi, On 28/01/18 16:56, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 04:37:36PM +, James Cowgill wrote: >> Now that salsa is stable, I am going to start migrating things over. I > > Thank you for doing the work! > >> One other change from the proposed plan is the addition of the >>

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 04:37:36PM +, James Cowgill wrote: > Now that salsa is stable, I am going to start migrating things over. I Thank you for doing the work! > One other change from the proposed plan is the addition of the > "tagpending" webhook described here: >

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

Hi, On 01/01/18 17:43, James Cowgill wrote: > Migration > === > Migration of the maintainer email address can start immediately. New > packages can also immediately start hosting their VCS on salsa.debian.org. > > For existing packages, I propose: > - Wait until salsa.debian.org is declared

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

On 01/26/2018 11:22 AM, James Cowgill wrote: >> has somebody started to work on that already? > > I've had a go at writing a script in python which does some of this. > I've put it here: > https://salsa.debian.org/jcowgill/multimedia-cli > cool, thanks for sharing. it still uses the

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

Hi, On 26/01/18 09:25, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > On 01/01/2018 06:43 PM, James Cowgill wrote: >> we need to migrate things over to salsa > > thanks for taking the initiative! >> >> New Vcs-* URLs: >> > > formorer has setup a redirection system, which would allow us to keep > the

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

On 01/01/2018 06:43 PM, James Cowgill wrote: > we need to migrate things over to salsa thanks for taking the initiative! > > New Vcs-* URLs: > formorer has setup a redirection system, which would allow us to keep the old anonscm URLs, which i think should be preferred over re-setting the Vcs-*

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

Hi On 2018-01-01 17:43:57, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > As you've probably seen, the Debian Gitlab instance salsa.debian.org is > up and running (in beta). Since alioth.debian.org is deprecated and > might be disabled soon, we need to migrate things over to salsa. > > This is what I propose.

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 2:43 PM, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > As you've probably seen, the Debian Gitlab instance salsa.debian.org is > up and running (in beta). Since alioth.debian.org is deprecated and > might be disabled soon, we need to migrate things over to salsa. >

Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

Hi, As you've probably seen, the Debian Gitlab instance salsa.debian.org is up and running (in beta). Since alioth.debian.org is deprecated and might be disabled soon, we need to migrate things over to salsa. This is what I propose. I posted it on IRC, but for more discussion I'm posting it to