Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Miguel Colon
Hello: Assuming you did a gbp-pull and git-buildpackage is configured correctly it should work. Also when I created the missing tag a while ago I confirmed that upstream/1.7 contain the correct source when compared to a tarball I downloaded from upstream and I also merged upstream/1.7 to master

Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Joel Roth
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:09:44AM +, Miguel Colon wrote: Hello: Assuming you did a gbp-pull and git-buildpackage is configured correctly it should work. Also when I created the missing tag a while ago I confirmed that upstream/1.7 contain the correct source when compared to a tarball I

Bug#611791: libmms0: libmms alignment problems on ARM

2011-02-02 Thread Danny Baumann
Package: libmms0 Version: 0.6-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream libmms 0.6 has some alignment issues on ARM. This causes any mms_connect() to fail on those platforms due to GUID compare mismatches. See http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3137994group_id=101989atid=630607 for the

Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Miguel Colon
Hello: That should work. Try to pull the commit I just made to make sure. It should complain at dh_installchangelogs now. Cheers, Miguel On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:09:44AM +, Miguel Colon wrote: Hello: Assuming you did a

Bug#611791: libmms0: libmms alignment problems on ARM

2011-02-02 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 02.02.2011 10:14, schrieb Danny Baumann: libmms 0.6 has some alignment issues on ARM. This causes any mms_connect() to fail on those platforms due to GUID compare mismatches. See http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3137994group_id=101989atid=630607 for the upstream bug report. As

Bug#611791: libmms0: libmms alignment problems on ARM

2011-02-02 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 02.02.2011 10:14, schrieb Danny Baumann: libmms 0.6 has some alignment issues on ARM. This causes any mms_connect() to fail on those platforms due to GUID compare mismatches. See http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3137994group_id=101989atid=630607 for the upstream bug report. As

Bug#611791: libmms0: libmms alignment problems on ARM

2011-02-02 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 02.02.2011 10:58, schrieb Danny Baumann: Please excuse my lack of understanding, but given that only maintenance and bugfixing work seems to be done in upstream libmms, and given that the alignment bug makes it impossible to properly use libmms on ARM, why are the newer releases not

Bug#611791: libmms0: libmms alignment problems on ARM

2011-02-02 Thread Danny Baumann
Hi, libmms 0.6 has some alignment issues on ARM. This causes any mms_connect() to fail on those platforms due to GUID compare mismatches. See http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3137994group_id=101989atid=630607 for the upstream bug report. As this is fixed in later upstream

Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?

2011-02-02 Thread David Henningsson
Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem? -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.

Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?

2011-02-02 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in soundtouch packaging, or

Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?

2011-02-02 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth: On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides libsoundtouch-dev but not

Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?

2011-02-02 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soundtouch/news/20110116T154758Z.html says: * Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy. - Obsolete c2

Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?

2011-02-02 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth: On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but this is not built by the

Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Joel Roth
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:45:50AM +, Miguel Colon wrote: Hello: That should work. Try to pull the commit I just made to make sure. It should complain at dh_installchangelogs now. Great. It goes much further. A few lintian warnings remain. W: mma source: changelog-should-mention-nmu

Re: Adopting Ecasound

2011-02-02 Thread Joel Roth
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:45:19PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: Hello, sorry for the late reply, I'm currently on vacation and Internet connectivity is quite unreliable (I also don't have my PC). Thanks for dropping by! :-) On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 03:24, Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote:

Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-02 Thread Miguel Colon
Hello: Sure, I fixed a few things since I only planned to make 1 commit but made a mistake since I forgot about the dh_install limitations. Anyway since you seem to be doing well on your own now I was gonna leave it at this but I noticed that you added a new manpage on the source. When using

Bug#599329: vainfo segfaults

2011-02-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 11:05:33PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: $ vainfo libva: libva version 0.31.1 Xlib: extension XFree86-DRI missing on display :0.0. libva: va_getDriverName() returns 0 libva: Trying to open /usr/lib/dri/nvidia_drv_video.so zsh: segmentation fault vainfo If I

Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?

2011-02-02 Thread Miguel Colon
So looks like a transition to me, and we probably need to readjust ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of this if agreed upon. Hello, yes it's a transition I was the one that made renamed it. Perhaps Alessio wants to provide further clarification. Last time I

NICE TO MEET YOU

2011-02-02 Thread Rejoice Ruben
Nice to meet you, My name is Miss Rejoice,i saw your profile today and became interested in you,i will also like to know you more,and i want you to send an email to my email address so i can give you my picture for you to know whom i am.Here is my email

Bug#599329: vainfo segfaults

2011-02-02 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 22:02:19 (CET), Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 11:05:33PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: $ vainfo libva: libva version 0.31.1 Xlib: extension XFree86-DRI missing on display :0.0. libva: va_getDriverName() returns 0 libva: Trying to open

Bug#599329: vainfo segfaults

2011-02-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:43:20AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: $ vainfo libva: libva version 0.31.1 Xlib: extension XFree86-DRI missing on display :0.0. libva: va_getDriverName() returns 0 libva: Trying to open /usr/lib/dri/nvidia_drv_video.so zsh: segmentation fault vainfo

Bug#599329: vainfo segfaults

2011-02-02 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 07:51:14 (CET), Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:43:20AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: $ vainfo libva: libva version 0.31.1 Xlib: extension XFree86-DRI missing on display :0.0. libva: va_getDriverName() returns 0 libva: Trying to open