---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124959/#review84513
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Edmundson
On Aug. 28, 2015,
On Aug. 27, 2015, 7:04 nachm., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
Since this is indeed a very often required feature, why do we keep it
hidden? If it can have negative side-effects, it we should warn users about
them, not hide the whole feature from them.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
or restricte
On Aug. 27, 2015, 7:04 nachm., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
Since this is indeed a very often required feature, why do we keep it
hidden? If it can have negative side-effects, it we should warn users about
them, not hide the whole feature from them.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
or restricte
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124956/#review84515
---
Thanks for looking into this.
This looks like it is going to
On Aug. 27, 2015, 9:04 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
Since this is indeed a very often required feature, why do we keep it
hidden? If it can have negative side-effects, it we should warn users about
them, not hide the whole feature from them.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
or restricte to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124962/
---
(Updated Aug. 28, 2015, 7:39 a.m.)
Review request for Plasma and Martin
On Aug. 27, 2015, 9:04 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
Since this is indeed a very often required feature, why do we keep it
hidden? If it can have negative side-effects, it we should warn users about
them, not hide the whole feature from them.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
or restricte to
On Aug. 28, 2015, 9:52 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Thanks for looking into this.
This looks like it is going to break the UI being tab-navigatable, which we
can't have.
Any idea what item is taking focus when this occurs?
Any idea what item is taking focus when this occurs?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/
---
Review request for Plasma and Kåre Särs.
Repository: plasma-workspace
On Aug. 28, 2015, 11:25 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, line 83
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/diff/1/?file=399467#file399467line83
if (XCB_EVENT_RESPONSE_TYPE(event-response_type) == XCB_FOCUS_OUT)
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124555/
---
(Updated Aug. 28, 2015, 8:01 a.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124555/#review84516
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Martin Gräßlin
On Aug. 28, 2015,
http://files.kde.org/snapshots/unstable-amd64-latest.iso.mirrorlist
# changes
- ISO back to tracking master builds
- random packaging improvements
# errata
- kdepim presently broken on this ISO because it keeps having build
problems on masters
- installer icon looks out of place in installer
On Aug. 28, 2015, 7:52 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Thanks for looking into this.
This looks like it is going to break the UI being tab-navigatable, which we
can't have.
Any idea what item is taking focus when this occurs?
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Any idea what item is
http://arch.pangea.pub/ISO/plasma-mobile/plasma-arch-20150828-x86_64.iso
To start plasma-mobile write this ISO file to usb stick and boot from it.
Once you have booted you will be autologged in the phablet user. Enter
kwinwrapper command to start the plasma-mobile
- Arch based image genration
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124918/#review84528
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Daniel Vrátil
On Aug. 28, 2015, 8:48
On Aug. 28, 2015, 9:52 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Thanks for looking into this.
This looks like it is going to break the UI being tab-navigatable, which we
can't have.
Any idea what item is taking focus when this occurs?
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Any idea what item is
On Aug. 28, 2015, 1:25 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, line 83
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/diff/1/?file=399467#file399467line83
if (XCB_EVENT_RESPONSE_TYPE(event-response_type) == XCB_FOCUS_OUT)
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
GENERAL INFO
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/plasma-workspace%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/151/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:09:38 +
Build duration: 2 min 38 sec
CHANGE SET
Revision
On Aug. 28, 2015, 7:52 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Thanks for looking into this.
This looks like it is going to break the UI being tab-navigatable, which we
can't have.
Any idea what item is taking focus when this occurs?
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Any idea what item is
On Aug. 28, 2015, 9:52 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Thanks for looking into this.
This looks like it is going to break the UI being tab-navigatable, which we
can't have.
Any idea what item is taking focus when this occurs?
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Any idea what item is
GENERAL INFO
BUILD SUCCESS
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/plasma-workspace%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/152/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:33:18 +
Build duration: 6 min 52 sec
CHANGE SET
Revision
GENERAL INFO
BUILD SUCCESS
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/plasma-workspace%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/152/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:33:18 +
Build duration: 6 min 52 sec
CHANGE SET
Revision
On Aug. 28, 2015, 9:52 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Thanks for looking into this.
This looks like it is going to break the UI being tab-navigatable, which we
can't have.
Any idea what item is taking focus when this occurs?
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Any idea what item is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/#review84531
---
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp (line 74)
On Aug. 28, 2015, 11:25 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, line 83
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/diff/1/?file=399467#file399467line83
if (XCB_EVENT_RESPONSE_TYPE(event-response_type) == XCB_FOCUS_OUT)
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124555/
---
(Updated Aug. 28, 2015, 8:09 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Aug. 28, 2015, 9:52 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Thanks for looking into this.
This looks like it is going to break the UI being tab-navigatable, which we
can't have.
Any idea what item is taking focus when this occurs?
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Any idea what item is
On Aug. 28, 2015, 1:25 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, line 83
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/diff/1/?file=399467#file399467line83
if (XCB_EVENT_RESPONSE_TYPE(event-response_type) == XCB_FOCUS_OUT)
what is that
On Aug. 28, 2015, 9:52 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Thanks for looking into this.
This looks like it is going to break the UI being tab-navigatable, which we
can't have.
Any idea what item is taking focus when this occurs?
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Any idea what item is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/#review84530
---
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp (line 83)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124956/
---
(Updated Aug. 28, 2015, 11:36 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Aug. 28, 2015, 1:25 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, line 83
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/diff/1/?file=399467#file399467line83
if (XCB_EVENT_RESPONSE_TYPE(event-response_type) == XCB_FOCUS_OUT)
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Thanks for the replay
2015-08-28 14:31 GMT+02:00 David Edmundson da...@davidedmundson.co.uk:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:24 AM, kainz.a kain...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok I would prefere to have the icons at one place because Uri and I do a
lot of work that the right icon in the right SIZE is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124959/
---
(Updated Aug. 28, 2015, 12:25 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:24 AM, kainz.a kain...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok I would prefere to have the icons at one place because Uri and I do a
lot of work that the right icon in the right SIZE is available for the
application in the screenshot you see toolbar icons (22px) for the widgets
(64px)
On Aug. 28, 2015, 1:29 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, line 74
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/diff/1/?file=399467#file399467line74
also that's an interesting spelling of Focus
oh does it have to be Focous? /me runs and hides
-
On Aug. 28, 2015, 11:25 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, line 83
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/diff/1/?file=399467#file399467line83
if (XCB_EVENT_RESPONSE_TYPE(event-response_type) == XCB_FOCUS_OUT)
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124966/#review84542
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Edmundson
On Aug. 28, 2015,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
n...@leippe.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@leippe.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #7 from Rewarp rew...@thestrayworld.com ---
I have been using this script since the day I uploaded it, and on a newly
reinstalled desktop as well. I am running an ATI card using the DVI port, so
that could be the difference.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #6 from n...@leippe.com ---
related to: ?
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/791786/linux/dpms-not-working-on-gtx980-with-displayport-connection/2/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124962/#review84546
---
CMakeLists.txt (line 38)
On Aug. 27, 2015, 7:04 nachm., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
Since this is indeed a very often required feature, why do we keep it
hidden? If it can have negative side-effects, it we should warn users about
them, not hide the whole feature from them.
Thomas Lübking wrote:
or restricte
44 matches
Mail list logo
