This isn't a bad idea. I've been somewhat frustrated with the situation
on X11 for a few years.
Given that the only true blocker for using Qt scaling is the fact that
it breaks mixed-DPI multimonitor quite badly, I think you are right that
we could express this trade-off in the UI, and let
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/kscreen/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/62/
Project:
stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:49:35 +
Build duration:
31 min and counting
JUnit Tests
Name:
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/kwin/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/2493/
Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:21:43 +
Build duration:
1 hr 47 min and counting
JUnit Tests
Name: projectroot
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/kscreen/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/156/
Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:25:03 +
Build duration:
41 min and counting
JUnit Tests
Name:
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/plasma-workspace/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/2191/
Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:24:52 +
Build duration:
39 min and counting
JUnit Tests
Name:
BUILD SUCCESS
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/bluedevil/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/254/
Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:24:58 +
Build duration:
30 min and counting
BUILD SUCCESS
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/xdg-desktop-portal-kde/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/59/
Project:
stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:24:49 +
Build duration:
29 min and counting
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/plasma-workspace/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/354/
Project:
stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:57:12 +
Build duration:
11 min and counting
JUnit Tests
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/plasma-workspace/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/2190/
Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 19:04:02 +
Build duration:
4 min 51 sec and counting
CONSOLE OUTPUT
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/bluedevil/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/253/
Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:55:26 +
Build duration:
9 min 13 sec and counting
CONSOLE OUTPUT
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/kscreen/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/155/
Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:53:55 +
Build duration:
7 min 51 sec and counting
CONSOLE OUTPUT
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/kwin/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/2492/
Project:
kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:03:00 +
Build duration:
49 min and counting
CONSOLE OUTPUT
[...truncated 2737
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/plasma-workspace/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/353/
Project:
stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:17:08 +
Build duration:
29 min and counting
CONSOLE OUTPUT
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/kscreen/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/61/
Project:
stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:11:17 +
Build duration:
34 min and counting
CONSOLE OUTPUT
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/plasma-workspace/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/352/
Project:
stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:13:49 +
Build duration:
1 hr 3 min and counting
JUnit Tests
+1 to the dates
+1 to the 5.25 kickoff to be within the sprint
Thanks!
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 4:47 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
>
> Should we have a 5.25 kickoff meeting? Should that be part of this sprint?
> (It may be distracting if the point of the sprint is Plasma 6.)
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> On
Should we have a 5.25 kickoff meeting? Should that be part of this sprint?
(It may be distracting if the point of the sprint is Plasma 6.)
Jonathan
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 15:38, Marco Martin wrote:
> also discussed during the meeting this seems the latest agreement for
> the sprint.
> is it
Works for me.
Nate
On 2/14/22 08:38, Marco Martin wrote:
also discussed during the meeting this seems the latest agreement for
the sprint.
is it ok for everybody? i would make this date final
+1
Nate
On 2/14/22 08:37, Marco Martin wrote:
during the meeting today it was proposed to do it together in the
sprint, is it ok for everybody?
also discussed during the meeting this seems the latest agreement for
the sprint.
is it ok for everybody? i would make this date final
--
Marco Martin
during the meeting today it was proposed to do it together in the
sprint, is it ok for everybody?
During the meeting has also been talked about doing the sprint on 5-6
march and doing the kickoff meeting together the sprint itself
Nico
* Mostly post-5.24 bug squashing
* Fix application launcher containment action:
https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/merge_requests/1445
* Fix
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/plasma-workspace/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/351/
Project:
stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:01:38 +
Build duration:
3 min 31 sec and counting
CONSOLE
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/xdg-desktop-portal-kde/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/58/
Project:
stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:58:58 +
Build duration:
1 min 31 sec and counting
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/kwin/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/315/
Project:
stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:33:24 +
Build duration:
26 min and counting
JUnit Tests
Name:
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Plasma/job/kwin/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/314/
Project:
stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.15
Date of build:
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:28:06 +
Build duration:
4 min 5 sec and counting
CONSOLE OUTPUT
Sensible enough, but the developers do need to follow Plasma's release
schedule then. Changing name after repo freeze shouldn't happen. Nor
should adding new dependencies or depending on versions of Frameworks newer
than our release specifies
On venerdì 11 febbraio 2022 01:26:26 CET Aleix Pol wrote:
> We should wrap this as the dates are getting near.
>
> Should we do March 5th and 6th?
+1
--
Marco Martin
28 matches
Mail list logo
