Agreed, I think it makes sense. Also maybe we should have a policy of
"don't avoid backporting just because no more releases are planned" as a
sufficient number of backported patched can indicate that we should do
another release.
Nate
On 2/12/24 03:53, David Edmundson wrote:
Plasma 5.27
On 12/2/24 21:34, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
Agreed.
I also think it’s a bad mindset to have “there won’t be any 5.27
release”. We should for now treat backporting as if there will be
another one, given 6.0 isn’t even out yet.
Cheers
Kai Uwe
Am 12.02.24 um 11:53 schrieb David Edmundson:
Empty Message
I agree,
but as discussed in the meeting today, if we want to do a 5.27
release, we should backport the ci adaptations and make ci actually
work there
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:53 AM David Edmundson
wrote:
>
> Plasma 5.27 is not getting any more regular timed releases. However in
> the past for
Agreed.
I also think it’s a bad mindset to have “there won’t be any 5.27
release”. We should for now treat backporting as if there will be
another one, given 6.0 isn’t even out yet.
Cheers
Kai Uwe
Am 12.02.24 um 11:53 schrieb David Edmundson:
Plasma 5.27 is not getting any more regular
Plasma 5.27 is not getting any more regular timed releases. However in
the past for LTS releases we have said that we would just make them
on-demand if there's enough stuff.
I've seen enough patches over the last month that warrant putting into
5.27 with people not cherry-picking some major fixes
