mart added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D2448#46454, @colomar wrote:
> UI-wise, I'd do it differently.
> Currently, the description of what the checkbox affects and the checkbox
itself are too far separated, plus it makes it sound like the layout is going
to be changed
colomar added a comment.
UI-wise, I'd do it differently.
Currently, the description of what the checkbox affects and the checkbox
itself are too far separated, plus it makes it sound like the layout is going
to be changed even if the checkbox is not checked. Instead what I'd do is,
below
