broulik added a comment.
As I already mentioned this morning I'm not too fond of the idea of locking
the session for that. But I won't stand in the way of simplifying our codebase
either. ±0 from me, if we can have an "Unlock" button for password-less
accounts eventually.
REPOSITORY
colomar added a comment.
Big +1, yay for consistency!
REPOSITORY
rKSCREENLOCKER KScreenLocker
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D2525
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: davidedmundson, #plasma
Cc: colomar, mart, graesslin,
mart added a comment.
+1 (whis will make it completely modal without being able to see the screen
behing tough, which i don't think is a big issue)
in any way works on wayland :)
REPOSITORY
rKSCREENLOCKER KScreenLocker
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D2525
EMAIL
graesslin added a comment.
> KSldApp::self()->lock(DefaultToSwitchUser)
That won't work on Wayland. There ksmserver is not responsible for the lock
screen and doesn't interact with KSldApp. Thus I would rather go for adding a
dedicated call to the org.kde.screensaver DBus interface.
